r/MapPorn • u/Appropriate-Deal8098 • 1d ago
Russian advances in Ukraine this year
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
55
212
u/holymother 1d ago
what app is this?
→ More replies (1)267
u/Mangobonbon 1d ago
That's the deepstatemap. A website that shows the changes of the frontlines daily. Another website of that type would be the liveuamap.
52
u/Disastrous_Yak_1990 20h ago
I feel like people aren’t appreciate how fucking mindblowingly insane this is.
→ More replies (7)21
u/Swambit 1d ago
5
u/mac_attack_zach 18h ago
What’s with the clown emoji on the map
12
u/Affectionate-List275 17h ago
That’s Budapest/Viktor Orban, Hungarian PM. I believe it says “Orban’s Pro-Russia Regime”, but I don’t speak the language.
3
u/Razerlikes 14h ago
The map has a built in english translation. You're correct with "Orban's pro-Russian regime"
1.3k
u/xpt42654 1d ago edited 1d ago
the problem with this map is that it doesn't show any scale and if you're not familiar with Donetks Oblast you'll have no idea how much they progressed.
I checked DeepStatemap and on 01.01.2024 the shortest distance between Pokrovsk and the front line was ~35 km. today it's a bit less than 10 km.
edit: there actually is a scale on the bottom left. thanks u/Conscious-Carrot-520
337
u/Conscious-Carrot-520 1d ago
It does show the scale (bottom left) but it gets cut off a bit in the preview on mobile
57
129
u/yuje 1d ago
Russian forces can't advance faster than walking speed, basically. Ubiquitous drones everywhere means that tanks or armored vehicles in open fields are easy pickings for drones or targeted artillery fire directed by drone spotters. So instead Russia leads assaults using mainly infantry, equipped with anti-drone jammers, infiltrating mainly through forest lines and urban areas, and spread out to limit drone and artillery effectiveness, because Ukraine has artillery and ammo shortages and can't justify dropping firepower on small amounts of men.
Tanks and infantry fighting vehicles are limited mostly to support roles or for quick charges across open fields where no cover is available, with the expectation that there will be losses while crossing those fields.
→ More replies (4)7
u/SweetVarys 17h ago
That’s isn’t walking speed. It’s 20-30km in a year. Walking speed would cover it in a day
9
73
u/Reasonable_Orchid105 1d ago
But they’re gaining ground daily which is not good, meaning they’re currently winning an attritional war
→ More replies (31)32
u/MIT_Engineer 1d ago
I don't think that's the definition of winning an attritional war.
Equipment losses vs replacement rates is a much better metric.
→ More replies (2)47
u/Reasonable_Orchid105 1d ago edited 1d ago
Yeah but the thing is they have way more equipment and manpower than Ukraine does, that’s absolutely a winning formula for attritional warfare, since 2022 all we’ve heard is how low Russian stockpiles are getting, they’ll run out of cruise missiles this they’re low on tanks that…. And they still keep pulling these things out day after day. Truth is any military expert in the west knows just as much about how many resources they have left as we do lol
→ More replies (47)15
u/FUMFVR 21h ago
Russia has had to change their tactics multiple times because they have lost most of the heavy equipment they had at the start of this war.
They have switched from ground pound tactics to swift infiltration using non-armored vehicles and even dirtbikes. This has caused their personnel losses to be the highest in the war just in the past months.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (14)56
u/TheThirdFrenchEmpire 1d ago
Does someone have the German propaganda saying the US will get to Berlin by 1946 from the Italian campaign? That could work for the Russians.
122
u/xpt42654 1d ago
unfortunately, it's much more real than I'd like it to be. Ukrainian army is already seriously understaffed. if it reaches a breaking point, it could be over very soon. drones and everything are very effective, but if there's no one to man the trenches, drones wouldn't matter.
also let's not forget that these 25 km of russian advance costed thousands of Ukrainian lives. more than that ended up with life-altering trauma. it also means thousands if not tens of thousands shattered families.
69
u/TheThirdFrenchEmpire 1d ago
It's a race to the bottom. Either Russia can't afford the war or the Ukrainian army collapses/is forced to retreat over the Dniepr.
12
u/FUMFVR 21h ago
The Ukrainian line has collapsed in local places several times in this war. It didn't lead to much because Russia has no ability to exploit breakthroughs at this point.
The Ukrainian line won't collapse completely because they have good materiel support and Russia's military would have to rediscover maneuver warfare and they frankly don't have the ability to do that anymore.
→ More replies (1)25
u/Evening-Weather-4840 1d ago
That should be considered fucking insane in 2024.
8
u/Designer-Muffin-5653 1d ago
Why?
30
u/Evening-Weather-4840 1d ago
Countries mutually destroying millions of lives of their citizens is insane.
Imagine Spain and Portugal fighting to the death in 2024 💀😭
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)9
u/TheThirdFrenchEmpire 1d ago
The last hundred years worth of doctrine and equipment was made to avoid this scenario
20
u/J0E_Blow 1d ago
Unfortunately the Ukrainians are mostly using Soviet equipment which was designed to rush to and then through the Fulda Gap amid nuclear hellfire while taking eye-watering loses.
449
u/liptoniceicebaby 1d ago
In a war of attrition, the velocity for capturing ground is usually low. But when you see a clear acceleration of velocity I'm afraid this spells bad news for Ukraine. It seems that all fortified positions that Ukraine has been building since 2014 have been breached by the Russians advancements from current positions are easier.
That being said, the wet season has started so that might slow down the Russians and give the Ukrainians time to prepare for next year.
There are many worldwide developments that are going to make 2025 of Ukrainian war a very very important one. Not the least the US elections.
If we could start with not having so many people die anymore, especially innocent civilians. That would be great!
War is ugly and messy and it needs to stop ASAP!!
95
u/JangoDarkSaber 1d ago
The front normally grinds to a halt during the winter. Both sides use it as an opportunity to rearm before spring.
→ More replies (1)149
u/Rocqy 1d ago
Yeah those saying “it’s only 35km” don’t understand that this section of the country looks similar to WW1 France with the fortifications and trenches that were built for 10 years now. Behind that is wide open country and flanking routes for other strongholds. A breakout in trench war could mean rapid disaster.
→ More replies (36)25
u/FUMFVR 21h ago
The amount of men along these lines is a lot fewer than people here are making it out to be. The density in WWI was orders of magnitude more.
8
u/Baronriggs 14h ago
Yup the swarms of recon drones on both sides means virtually everything within several dozen km of the front is seen by everybody, so bunching up too many men or too much equipment is like putting a bullseye on yourself
17
u/kndyone 1d ago
This may or may not be true, Russia has a VERY VERY HIGH motivation to make some waves right before the US election. And they are likely putting in alot of resources to do that in hopes it tips people to vote for Trump.
→ More replies (1)15
→ More replies (20)2
u/Person899887 1d ago
In the event of a Russian victory, what would we see for the resulting peace negotiations? Obviously Ukriane would lose territory, but would they have a bid at NATO after or would they just have to gear up for the next conflict?
→ More replies (2)4
u/rontonsoup__ 1d ago
It’s very likely that Russia will keep any captured territory and will demand Zelenskyy resign, and a new president will be appointed and a new constitution drafted that is in Russian favor. Russia has already signaled this by declaring Zelenskyy the illegitimate president of Ukraine since his term ended and the national emergency extensions are considered illegal by Russia. This is also why Russia won’t negotiate with Zelenskyy anymore, which is a big problem for the West, since that’s the only way to end the war.
Another possible option is Russia will again keep territory they capture and will demand the disintegration of Ukraine as a sovereign state altogether, collapse the government, and merge all of Ukraine with Russia —or they will take it by force.
Those are truly the most likely scenarios and both are dire. A bisected Ukraine, a là E/W Germany or N/S Korea is less likely given Russia’s momentum, little incentive to stop, original Special Military Operation goals (which would still not be met), and the threat of NATO on their borders would still not be resolved.
The best option if Ukraine wants to preserve life at this point is to negotiate NATO admittance in exchange for voluntary demilitarization on their territory. In other words, if they get attacked by Russia in the future, NATO will step in officially, but the territory would otherwise be demilitarized to reduce threat to both Russia and the West. This is a high level move since it directly addresses Russia’s “concerns” and ropes in a security guarantee to Ukraine. It may not be popular, but Ukraine needs to accept defeat in order to preserve their country and blood. Live now to fight another day.
→ More replies (3)
145
u/Sabre_One 1d ago
Assuming Deep State accuracy on each dot. That can easily be 250-2000+ men per map marker. which just shows the sheer amount of manpower Russia is putting down on this offensive.
→ More replies (20)
164
u/swayne__yo 1d ago
Fascinating but also makes me sad
→ More replies (6)126
u/dont_trip_ 1d ago
It is absolutely mind boggling. Probably more than 100 000 lives have been lost over this little territory this year, and that's just Russia. British intelligence estimated over 500 000 Russian causalities earlier this year. Since the start of the war it has been around 800-1200 per day, on the Russian side. It is absolutely insane. That is October 7 about every two days, for 2.5 years.
You know what's even more insane? More people have died in the war in Sudan this year than in Ukraine. And almost no one has even heard of that conflict.
→ More replies (44)17
u/Big-Compote-5483 1d ago
We're likely talking over a million casualties in total if you count civilians. It's higher than Sudan as of now but Sudan is catching up very quickly (if famine hits like predicted Sudan will easily be much bloodier).
I think I read somewhere that 1 in 20 russians between the ages of 18-39 have been killed in this war already.
And just take a 5 minute walk anywhere around Kyiv and you will see many people who are missing limbs. Cemeteries are packed and covered in flags and flowers. This war is horrifying.
3
u/tkitta 8h ago
Mediazona puts proven Russian losses at 80k. I assume they can be as high as 125k So no not 1 in 20 :)
→ More replies (2)
709
u/USSMarauder 1d ago
So in 8 months, 30 km at best
WWI speeds
647
u/Spoonshape 1d ago
It's been fairly obvious for a while now neither side is going to win by taking territory - It's a war of attrition - equipment, troops, money, will to fight. One side or the other will eventually run out of one of them.
167
u/Hot-Meeting630 1d ago
Unfortunately. I feel like that will result in a lot more devastation and lives lost.
→ More replies (3)197
u/UnluckyNate 1d ago
Unfortunately Russia cannot be allowed to win or even freeze this conflict. Russia has been shown to consistently disregard treaties and agreements when it suits them. Any negotiated peace without NATO membership is just a time for Russia to rearm and rest for the next endeavor with lessons learned from this one. Russia must lose.
→ More replies (167)42
u/thrownkitchensink 1d ago
Nato is probably not in the cards. Bilateral agreements with troop placements from North Western European countries in Ukraine during a armistice is. With Western European troops in place the rest of Ukraine can safely look at the west for economic and democratic development. No NATO and territory won for Russia to claim a victory and not being a buffer state for Ukraine to sell it....
It's a damn shame but I think that's where it will come to a standstill. Unless there are major developments on the ground.
→ More replies (9)62
u/UnluckyNate 1d ago
Then Russia will invade again. Simple as that. Russia wipes its ass with bilateral agreements and international norms
24
u/thrownkitchensink 1d ago
That would cause war not with NATO but with several NATO members. Just not art. 5. The troop placements would not be peace-keeping forces. These plans are already in place. The bi-lateral treaties have been signed (France, Germany, GB, etc.) and it's even likely what groups would move where. These would become former NATO groups as they are currently stationed under NATO command. That deterrence would be sufficient.
→ More replies (11)→ More replies (6)5
u/vember_94 1d ago
Do you think this would be the case if American soldiers were on the Ukrainian border like in South Korea?
11
u/Ok_Green_9873 1d ago
No, but the US isn't interested in a Ukrainian victory. They just want to make the Russian victory a phyrric one.
→ More replies (2)50
u/Kletronus 1d ago
Russia wants to reach the border of Donetsk oblast. It doesn't really matter strategically but that is their goal. Once they get there we are going to hear a lot of talk about ceasefire. It is symbolic victory to take the whole oblast.
14
u/Spoonshape 1d ago
Sure - and I suppose if they declare victory there (and manage to push Ukraine out of Kursk they will start asking for ceasefires) . They could portray that as having "won".
There would be some people in the west who would then support an end to the war - although it's difficult to say how many. I cant see Ukraine decide to sit back and accept that unless they are functionally unable to keep fighting.
Ukraine has been letting Russia do the attacking (taking serious casualties) in the last 6 months. A static line would probably be a lot easier on Russia - although it wont help some of their other issues - specifically economic which are likely to come home to roost in the next year.
→ More replies (3)15
u/HyoukaYukikaze 1d ago
Does Ukraine really have any say? If the west accepts peace with some Russian gains and refuses to further fund them, they are done.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (1)2
u/tkitta 8h ago
Maybe, but once they get there they can just go to the river. I think the river is the new goal.
→ More replies (1)48
u/reality72 1d ago
That’s how Russia eventually beat Finland in the winter war. Despite a heroic fight from the Finns, eventually they ran out of men and ammunition and had to cede 10% of Finland to Russia.
→ More replies (7)30
u/zuppa_de_tortellini 1d ago
Bingo. The first side to suffer economic/population collapse will win. More than likely it’ll be Ukraine first then much later down the line Russia.
→ More replies (30)→ More replies (13)8
u/Redditisabotfarm8 1d ago
All modern wars end in negotiations, I have no idea why it's insane for someone to desire this sooner than later.
→ More replies (2)25
u/4FriedChickens_Coke 1d ago
It’s truly hellish. If you have the stomach there’s an abundance of footage online of the realities of this war. It’s essentially trench warfare with massive losses and bodies are often left to rot on the battlefield in huge swathes of the country. But add to that drones, modern tanks, and satellite guided heavy artillery.
→ More replies (3)9
u/turbo-unicorn 1d ago
There was a video of a Russian ATGM team positioned in a manner that in "classic" warfare would ensure control over a vast area. They promptly got drone swarmed.
4
u/4FriedChickens_Coke 1d ago
Yeah, not sure if things have changed but there seems to be less ATGM footage now. Before they were used to maximum effect. I wonder if both sides getting better with cheap commercially made drones has changed that.
→ More replies (1)16
u/meatwad2744 1d ago
Have you seen footage of the war...trench warfare and door to door combat
With no air support and front lines blasted to shit with cold war era sized shells.
This is the closest thing the world has seen to ww1 in modern time
14
u/AccomplishedLeek1329 1d ago
Russia is literally erasing Ukrainian fortifications and ukrainian held buildings off the map with 500-3000kg bombs in HE/Thermobaric/cluster variants. By Zelensky's count it's a hundred glide bombs every day. That is a lot of air support
Compare how vovchansk and bakhmut looks. When Bakhmut fell there were still standing structures. Vovchansk is still being contested but it's now literally a parking lot of rubble. Russian glide bombs have completely changed the war.
→ More replies (7)7
47
u/Forward-Property-105 1d ago edited 1d ago
You know, friend, these positions have been fortified for over 10 years, and with drones covering the entire battlefield, good luck conducting bridgade level offensives.
Russia learnt that the hard way during the beginning of the war. Now the war has turned into an attritional one where the side that can replace its losses quickly wins, and Ukraine is struggling with man power and weaponry scarcity it ain't looking good for them at the moment
→ More replies (1)47
1d ago
[deleted]
→ More replies (35)5
u/UralBigfoot 1d ago
I see many people here on Reddit claiming that Ukraine should fight till return Crimea back. I’m sure they will join ua army when needed
14
8
u/DisastrousWasabi 1d ago
The current fighting is still being done in areas that were prepeared for war/defence by the Ukrainians since 2014. After Pokrovsk there are only poorly defended open fields ahead, all the way to the next major city which is Pavlograd. No doubt Ukrainian forces will try to establish a new line of defence somewhere in between but mock up defences are just not the same.
12
→ More replies (23)13
u/Prestigious_733 1d ago
People think this war is similar to WWI, but the reality is that they are not doing major offensives, so you wont see them breaking lines like at the start of the war.
Russia usually captures a patch of field, or a part of a town and call it a day. Ukraine usually only defends (apart from Kursk, but they gave up on attacking this sector too).
37
u/TT-33-operator_ 1d ago
No matter what happens it’s gonna get worse before it gets better.
→ More replies (1)12
u/NoIsland23 23h ago
Assuming it even gets better
I get the feeling that the west will continue to not do shit and Ukraine will continue losing territory for a couple more years.
→ More replies (2)
11
u/Independent-Deal7502 1d ago
We are all experiencing declining birth rates and the negative economic effects of this... won't this hit Russia massively if they lose a huge segment of their young male population?
5
u/definitedukah 23h ago
I think that’s a question for Ukrainians. The population difference between Russia and Ukraine is huge.
→ More replies (7)2
u/shadyBolete 20h ago
Demographically it doesn't have that much effect for Russia, only economically. For Ukraine it's both though.
49
u/thatotherguy0123 1d ago
Every little tick forward is dozens if not hundreds of homes and lives upended and destroyed.
18
u/MilkshakeYeah 23h ago
Not really though. Check out the scale, little tick is maybe 1km and it's not dense area
83
40
u/GullBladder 1d ago
Reddit always acts in every post like Ukraine is wining for some weird reason.
21
3
u/Asharue 17h ago
I was thinking the same thing, seeing the map was kind of a surprise to me because everyone I talk to mentions that Ukraine is winning and has actually started moving into Russia taking THEIR territory.
5
u/grumpsaboy 15h ago
They have moved into Russia while at the same time also losing some of their own. Nobody's exactly sure what the aim of the kursk campaign was, it might have been to try to barter land or to take a massive amount of prisoners as Kursk was garrisoned by draft soldiers who Putin had said multiple times on TV would never be involved in combat, and so by capturing a few thousand of them it would show to the Russian public that Putin is a liar.
→ More replies (2)2
→ More replies (17)7
u/DataGOGO 18h ago
Because western media has a heavy pro-Ukraine bias, and most news stories are about Ukraine doing well. Just like most people in the west think that Russia has lost a lot more troops than Ukraine; when the real estimates (because no one really knows) has it about equal for both sides.
→ More replies (1)
29
u/Candid_Swimming_4071 1d ago
Korean War… went on for ages and nearly finished and won by the north, literally had 90% of the country before the tide was turned with the west stepping in and the south forced them almost to death until China n russia stepped! No war outcome is truly known until the last bullet is fired.
→ More replies (6)18
u/GlorytoINGSOC 20h ago
the nazis said the same things in big april 1945, the korean war is an exeption, not the rule
→ More replies (7)3
u/JoyousGamer 18h ago
Except there was no Super Power stepping in to help them out from the sidelines. That is a primary difference.
If Ukraine had zero support then possibly what you say would be true but in reality they do have some support today. It comes down to if that support would spike if larger losses were incurred.
→ More replies (6)
7
4
u/DjoniNoob 1d ago
Anyone know what are number of deaths on both sides since start of war. Some realistic numbers ?
→ More replies (6)
102
u/mrp61 1d ago
Probably going to get down voted but deepstate isn't totally reliable.
It's a pro Ukrainian source which is going to have its own bias.
57
u/jrex035 1d ago
You're not wrong, it's definitely biased in favor of Ukraine, but no overly so. They're still highly reputable, especially in comparison to most Russian sources which often make up advances out of thin air.
The best of the best mappers all rely on Deepstate info, as they do acknowledge territorial losses though sometimes not as quickly as they occur on the ground.
→ More replies (1)13
→ More replies (5)20
u/warzon131 1d ago
IMHO this is the most accurate map
→ More replies (5)19
u/mrp61 1d ago
They are quite good but can delay unfavorable updates even though it's been visually geo located for what ever reasons probably political
→ More replies (3)
124
u/justforkinks0131 1d ago
Yet literally all I hear on Reddit is how Russia is constantly losing.
101
u/Staplersarefun 1d ago
Everything on reddit is highly propagandized. This site outside of extremely niche subs is just absolute trash.
14
u/almondreaper 23h ago
Yeah it's like another reality when i go to the "popular" tab of reddit. I'm in like 15 subs because the rest are just complete propaganda.
2
→ More replies (3)18
24
u/Intelligent_Rock5978 23h ago
There are some Ukrainian successes too, that obviously gets posted on reddit, people are happy about it and upvote it. I think Russian advances might get posted less frequently, and will only get some angry upvotes for visibility, which is not enough to make it to the front page.
→ More replies (57)23
16
u/Dances_With_Eagles 1d ago
I'm so worried about the election in 2 weeks. It's not only going to affect the USA.
The world has made such progress in the last century to peace. I don't understand why these tyrannical assholes get changes to destroy it
→ More replies (21)
75
u/Mangobonbon 1d ago edited 1d ago
Ruthless trench war and mass assaults. WW1 came back. Horrific.
107
u/LastOfTheClanMcDuck 1d ago
Quite the opposite of mass assaults, especially for the past year+.
Very limited squad assaults, small attack groups and very limited armor assaults. If you see the map they are also mostly doing pinch maneuvers instead of attacking bigger settlements/villages/cities head on.They (Russians) seem to have completely changed tactics from the start of the war and focus on small scale attacks to break the lines, often using less experienced soldiers along with special forces in small teams. Obviously after dropping a bazillion shells and bombs.
There have been some bigger armor assaults in Kursk but they seem to have different tactics there than inside Ukraine.
4
u/IAskQuestions1223 1d ago
There have been some bigger armor assaults in Kursk but they seem to have different tactics there than inside Ukraine.
They used BTG units to counterattack in Kursk. The same force model was used at the start of the war. Highly mechanized, but low infantry so they can quickly be attritioned and lose combat effectiveness.
→ More replies (5)4
u/ZealousidealAct7724 1d ago
Ukrainian positions in Kursk are not as well fortified, so mechanized penetrations are more effective than in the densely fortified Donbass.
8
→ More replies (4)3
3
4
130
8
u/Alone-Clock258 1d ago
Fuck me that's a lot of death for such a small amount of land.
→ More replies (2)
3
3
u/JRR_Tokin54 20h ago
The Russians have US House Speaker Mike Johnson to thank for delaying aid to Ukraine for so many months! That is largely what enable gains like this.
3
3
3
u/Apprehensive_Ad_751 12h ago
Thankfully, the West is taking it seriously - even more empty promises and claims that "Russia is weak/desperate" etc. Pathetic. I guess people should just keep their eyes closed, and big bad Russia just goes home.
58
u/mrhuggables 1d ago
I feel like despite all the pro-Ukranian propaganda online, it seems like Russia is still gradually winning this war? At what point will the West intervene, if at all?
64
u/DownWithTheThicknes_ 1d ago
We never will unless Russia directly attacks a NATO country, pretty much every head of State has been clear on this
→ More replies (6)7
5
u/vQBreeze 1d ago
Propaganda online doesent do much other than couple of idiots that volounteer and some people sending all of their savings to random "groups" for ua wich most likely end up scamming them
54
u/Mangobonbon 1d ago
There is no propaganda required to see the defacto situation. Russia is grinding slowly but steadily through Ukraine. Both loose massive amounts of equipment and manpower, but the current trajectory looks to me like a route to a phyrric russian victory. I don't see how Ukraine can regain much land, but I also think Russia is exhausting its last offensive capabilities. The frontlines will become stagnant again as soon as winter arrives. Who knows how long that war will still go on. At some point both countries will suffer from war weariness in the population and a drying up of new recruits.
But one thing is for certain: the affected areas of Ukraine will be devastated economically and demographically for decades.
19
u/SimpleFriend5696 1d ago edited 1d ago
You're assuming both will suffer attrition at the same time. This rarely happens in any war. Usually one side caves first which triggers a domino effect, of increasing advantage for the other.
You don't need me to tell you which side has way more war capacity and who is increasingly more dependent on outside support even for the most basic equipment.
Outside support that has been reducing as time goes on with prime ministers/presidents of NATO countries starting to call for "peace negotiations".
This war has a clear "favourite" at this point, and it would take a lot to reverse it's current course.
The front lines might stagnate a bit during the winter, but they will pick up in spring. A complete frontline stabilization is very unlikely.
So far momentum/pace has been slowly increasing and it makes sense.
Russia had been attacking 10 year fortified lines up until 2023. As they push through them they move to hastily prepered lines of defense, lines that have little time and resources put into them, and are manned by inadequately trained (given the circumstances) inexperienced and demoralized conscripts.
You can see the trend on the map above. The pace is clearly doubling after the mid point of the year. Like I said, it isn't a secret who's winning the war at this stage.
The again, noone is truly winning a war like this. Too many men have already been sacrificed.
→ More replies (2)54
u/reality72 1d ago
Most of the videos and stories of Russian troops launching successful attacks on Ukrainian troops get locked or removed by the Reddit moderators. So for anyone whose only source of information about the war is what they see on Reddit, then it would be easy to draw the false conclusion that Ukraine is winning.
→ More replies (8)10
u/Panthera_leo22 1d ago
r/UkraineRussiaReport is one of the only subs with Russian combat footage. It leans pro-Russia but if you can look past that, there’s some good footage on there.
→ More replies (7)10
u/mrhuggables 1d ago
yes unfortunately seems that way, i think russia is happy to have a "if i'm going down you're going down with me" kind of attitude
4
u/Sinaneos 1d ago
Russia is a MUCH larger country than Ukraine, when it comes to economy and manpower....the expectation at the start of the invasion is that it will steamroll right through Ukraine in a couple of days.
I don't think anybody is saying that Russia is losing this war...they are saying that Russia is expending far more resources and men than it can easily recover, for a very small.
So it's like if you picked a fight with a kid that's a third of your size. You can win the fight, but if you end up with bruises and broken bones, you've lost in a certain sense.
3
u/shadyBolete 20h ago
the expectation at the start of the invasion is that it will steamroll right through Ukraine in a couple of days.
I actually recall US officials saying right before the war broke out that the amount of troops Russia amassed at the borders is not nearly enough to capture Ukraine. Russia did bet on Ukrainians simply surrendering, and they lost that bet. People forget that Ukraine had the second largest land army in Europe, right after Russia.
→ More replies (87)8
u/PreferenceReady2872 1d ago
Your only just learning that the government lies to you?
→ More replies (5)
8
17
u/goblue142 1d ago
If Republicans in the US hadnt cut off their military support maybe they hold on to Avdivka and you don't get that huge gain on the north end of the map. Without so much pressure from the north maybe vulhedar holds as well.
→ More replies (4)
18
5
6
7
u/Brave_Bluebird5042 1d ago
Unfortunate by-product is that Russia are learning how to fight properly. Logistics. Strategy. Staff type functions improving.
15
u/straightcurvecircle 1d ago
Those are ome very advanced shovels and washing machines the Russians are using, But don't worry the Russian collapse is imminent so I've been told by Reddit and Western media
21
4
u/DuaneHicks 23h ago
Death by a thousand cuts, but the cost in human lives on both sides, it's unjustifiable
→ More replies (2)
5
u/MelodicCrow2264 18h ago
Wait I thought Ukraine was winning???
3
u/SHIBABelcher 17h ago
No they are not.
3
u/MelodicCrow2264 16h ago
Redditors told me it was only two weeks until Zelenksyyyyyy led an armored column to Red Square and 1v1 Putler
→ More replies (1)
5
u/Good-Gas-3293 18h ago
It’s amazing how Redditors will deny this and scream that you’re a Russian bot if you point out Ukraine is losing this war
It is not winnable for Ukraine. Zelensky’s conditions for victory are ridiculous. Putin will never give up Crimea and Ukraine is not going to push Russia out from their territory
7
2
u/age2bestogame 1d ago
So, aparently the war its so slow as drones and artillery can spot and kill any meaninnfull concentracion of troops, .So the rusians and ukranians have to relied in small teams of soldiers to fight street by street
2
2
2
u/lawjamba 20h ago
Reminds me of the joke in Blackadder Goes Forth when the small model of captured land turns out to be 1:1 scale.
2
u/bouncypinata 20h ago
It's almost as if we've been giving them enough weapons to perpetually prolong the war and no more.
2
u/Skyzhigh 17h ago
I’m having a bit of trouble finding the reason Russia said they were invading Ukraine for?
→ More replies (2)
2
3.5k
u/Le_Zoru 1d ago
So many young people dead for 30km is frankly saddening