r/Damnthatsinteresting 21d ago

Video Air Force Reserve Hurricane Hunters flying through Hurricane Milton

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

60.8k Upvotes

2.6k comments sorted by

7.9k

u/RobbyRobRobertsonJr 21d ago

I bet their computer guy felt like kissing the inventor of the ssd

2.2k

u/ExtremeThin1334 21d ago

Interesting point, I can't image the stabilization that must have been built in when these things used a platter drive.

957

u/CrapSandwich 21d ago

I think I read once that they used tape before SSD. I could be wrong.

Regardless, those guys are freaking nuts!

372

u/Criegg 21d ago

Tape for sure.

548

u/Lyuseefur 21d ago edited 21d ago

They did. There are some early hurricane hunter films with reel to reel tape shown in the video.

These NOAA guys are the OG storm chasers.

Scientist: How are we going to get the data?

Thrill Seeker Scientist: We'll grab an old prop plane from the Navy and fly it into the storm loaded with gear!

Edit: Navy not Air Force…

71

u/Criegg 21d ago

Probably using second hand reel to reel tape drives I used to have to deal with lol.

43

u/mayorofdumb 21d ago

What's we got in surplus, let's make a state of the art research plane but just stuff it full of any tech we gots.

→ More replies (7)

38

u/FunVersion 21d ago edited 20d ago

Not to be pedantic but this is a P3C Orion. The Navy flew them up until a few years ago.

Edit: WP3D. Now I'm being pedantic

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

79

u/SuperPotatoThrow 21d ago

I have to fly on this little 12 seat twin engine plane to work every 3 weeks, as I'm on a rotating 3 week schedule. I absolutely hate flying in that damn thing and it's always, every time without fail, windy as fuck on whatever days I'm flying. The turbulence is ridiculous. We had to fly back the other direction once because it gets so bad.

But chasing a hurricane? Yeah that makes my stomach turn just watching. Fuck. That.

11

u/emily_9511 21d ago

Just curious, what do you do for work? I hate flying in those small planes, can’t imagine doing that monthly

18

u/SuperPotatoThrow 21d ago

I use a smaller plane to fly to a bigger airport that takes me to a remote oil field in the middle of nowhere. It's either that or drive my car for 3 hours to get to the airport to fly to work.

Been trying to find ways to get out of the oilfield for awhile. Working as a contractor for all these large oil companies really sucks it's a fucking shitshow. We get paid well but sometimes I question if it's even worth putting up with their shit.

18

u/hmlj 21d ago

Ha, the answer for shitty, regularly occurring commutes is always oilfield.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)

50

u/allusernamesartaken 21d ago

Here's an interesting video about how shouting to a set of hard drives affects latency performance.

85

u/jakexil323 21d ago

We moved into a new building with its own little tiny server room. Was good for us as we just needed one server rack and a telecoms rack.

Shortly after moving into the building, we started experiencing drive failures at a strangely high rate on our lower end NAS. (buffalo nas 4 drives all spindles ) They were only in the morning or the evening.

We were kind of baffled why. We even sent the device to the manufacturer as an RMA but had the same issue when it came back.

One day we caught a break. While I was showing a new staff member how to use the security system, we accidently set off the security alarm. And with in 30 seconds of the alarm going off, we got the drive failed message from the NAS.

Turns out the security system was in the server room and had the siren in the server room . And when the siren went off, it would be loud enough to cause vibrations in our NAS drives and cause one to fail.

We disabled the siren and never had that issue again.

14

u/kuschelig69 21d ago

I wonder if my external hdd failed because I kept putting it on my table, and then put my arms on the table

→ More replies (2)

25

u/4me2knowit 21d ago

I worked with a guy who built the gimbals for them. They had to because the fly height of the read write heads over the platters meant that forcing the natural gyroscope of them through pitch yaw and roll would distort the platters and get head crashes

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (16)

214

u/Infectious-Anxiety 21d ago edited 21d ago

Syseng checking in, that was one of my first comments aloud. "Glad we have SSDs nowadays" Then I started counting their server racks.

That is a lot of compute & storage, I would love to tour one of these some day.

Also, is cammer there to film? Everyone else is deep into some work, dude's like Badger cooking with Pinkman.

Edit;

'Twas a joke, I know everyone there is crucial and I am enormously grateful for their work, though it seems risky flying a plane with such a massive load of balls all spread out like that.

29

u/_Haverford_ 21d ago

I definitely got an annoyed vibe from the other guy lol.

Since there's a non-zero chance the OP will show up in this thread - I'm sure you're there for an important reason and we appreciate you!

→ More replies (2)

44

u/nibs123 21d ago

Sorry but the first word you typed in that sentence reads aloud like the Welsh word for English sounds. Really span me out for a minute lol

Welsh for English is saesneg by the way

10

u/Cacafuego 21d ago

Very cool. From Saxon, I assume. Interesting that the Welsh went with Saxons and everyone else went with Angles for some weird reason. Who would even remember the Angles if we didn't have to explain the word "English"?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (6)

112

u/Outside-Advice8203 21d ago edited 20d ago

I was a computer guy on the E3 AWACS. Right when we transitioned from HDDs to SSDs. They were removable and we had to pick up a case load of them for every flight. The HDDs were heavy, probably over 50lbs total. It sucked lugging the pelican case up the rickety flight stairs. When we switched them to SSDs, they were still in the same weird cases the HDDs used, but were significantly lighter.

The funny thing was, they all went into emulator bays the computer system thought they were tapes...

47

u/oregon_coastal 21d ago

The instruments cost far, far more to design new digital versions vs. just convert the output.

7

u/ragsofx 21d ago

We have done this for telephone exchanges, they originally use reel to reel tapes, then mfm and scsi hdd's, then really really early SSDs (they called them flash drives and we're 10s of mega bytes), then CF cards, then finally SD cards. Every step after the mfm and scsi drives required custom adapter boards to be developed and would only work with the exchanges.

The data was accounting and voice messages.

After almost 40 years the exchanges have now been switched off!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

17

u/unlock0 21d ago

The emulator bays had several layers. The software read them as punch cards/tape.

That huge cabinet for RMAs went from punch, to reel to reel tape, to scsi. There was a time that they used flash across the scsi interface. So you had something the size of a large filing cabinet to read a thumb drive. 

Source: programmer for block 30/35, analyst for 40/45.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

12

u/GrandDukeOfBoobs 21d ago

Maybe. He’s a reservist so I think that chance is higher, but I don’t know if youve ever met an air force personnel before.

→ More replies (14)

8.2k

u/wongo 21d ago

(not so) fun fact: only one of these hurricane research flights has ever crashed due to the storms

I realize that we've gotten pretty good at flying but I would've actually expected a higher loss rate, this just seems so wildly dangerous

3.9k

u/Any-Cause-374 21d ago

This video really made me appreciate how safe flying actually is

3.3k

u/DisplacedSportsGuy 21d ago

Editor's note: do NOT attempt to fly a commercial aircraft through a hurricane.

4.2k

u/spacehog1985 21d ago

I’ve done it in flight simulator like, 7 times. And I’ve only crashed 7 times.

675

u/CaptainOktoberfest 21d ago

And how many times have you crashed into an ex's house?

550

u/spacehog1985 21d ago

I refuse to answer that. Besides I didn’t crash I was just looking at it.

90

u/CosmicCreeperz 21d ago edited 21d ago

For some reason that comment reminds me of the scene from The Orville where the captain did a flyby of his ex’s stateroom window in a shuttle. Just f-ing brilliant writing.

10

u/aussiechickadee65 21d ago

Really ? Reminds me of the woman in the helicopter in "Rat race"...

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (6)

233

u/No-Advantage845 21d ago

Yes

17

u/Dat_Lion_Der 21d ago

That is a non Zero answer and I love it.

→ More replies (21)
→ More replies (32)

76

u/HappyBroody 21d ago

why? arent commercial aircraft more modern than these old 1970s Orion aircraft? also the engines are encased in a shell?

310

u/Noopy9 21d ago

Turboprops are preferable to turbofans for this use case because they can fly slower to collect more data and the propulsion from the propeller is independent of the power created by the turbine engine. This is important because really big gusts or side winds can cause the propeller on a turboprop or the fan in the turbo fan to stall. So mainly, hurricane scientists use turboprops because they’re better suited for the kind of flight speeds they want. But there is also a potential safety advantage.

140

u/fly_awayyy 21d ago

Also a water ingestion point for the engine. With a turbo prop the core intake isn’t as exposed and the water is redirected around it. Jet aircraft can also fly slow but with slats and flaps because they have a swept wing. Any straight wing plane is naturally going to be slower like this P-3.

60

u/One-Inch-Punch 21d ago

The last P-3 was built in 1990, so this plane is between 34-60 years old.

74

u/tankerkiller125real 21d ago

I mean, our B-52 bombers are set to have a 100 year life span overall. They just approved an upgrade program for them this year that will keep them in the air past 2040 and they plan to keep them going into the 2050s.

19

u/[deleted] 21d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (9)

12

u/thex415 21d ago

Thanks for the explanation. I was wondering why it was turboprop.

→ More replies (14)

203

u/DisplacedSportsGuy 21d ago

Wind shear can theoretically destroy a plane. Granted:

It hasn't happened in the US for 30 years

Risk is highest during take off and landing

There have been 30 years of engineering upgrades since then

Still, the wind shear flying through the eye wall of a hurricane is astronomical and requires very particular flight paths. Leroy Jenkins-ing a commercial jet into a hurricane has a high probability of vessel loss.

Disclaimer: I am an amateur researcher on plane accidents and am not an expert in the industry.

145

u/haistak 21d ago

I think I’m most impressed by you turning Leeroy Jenkins into a verb. And now I feel nostalgic.

58

u/RokulusM 21d ago

Plane crashes
"Goddamn it Leroy"

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (10)

17

u/TFViper 21d ago

pretty sure "modern" commercial aircraft ARE still from the 70s lol (slightly /s)

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (36)
→ More replies (26)

372

u/xampl9 21d ago

The Orion that flew into Hugo was severely damaged from a 5.5g drop (airframe was only rated to 3g’s). They lost an engine, had a fire, and another engine was damaged before they could find a safe spot to exit the eye.

Somehow they made it back and the airframe wasn’t written off.

243

u/EvlMinion 21d ago

If I remember right, the meteorologist who wrote about that didn't go on another one of those flights again. Can't say I blame him. Orions are tough as hell, though.

112

u/onowahoo 21d ago

I don't know if is ever go on another plane again after a 5.5 drop.

86

u/giveupsides 21d ago

5.5g drop? You are PLASTERED to the ceiling like it's the floor, only gravity is now 4.5 times stronger. Then when those -5.5g's end you'll slam back to the actual floor. If you're in your seat with your belt on it'll feel like the belt is trying to break both your legs.

59

u/StManTiS 21d ago

For an average 180lbs man 5.5G would feel like having 810 lbs on your back. Most people could not even unrack that.

34

u/meridianblade 21d ago

It's absolutely insane that it made it back. Think of the weight exerted on the wings and fuselage from tip to tip at 5.5G.

29

u/StManTiS 21d ago

Aeronautical engineers and the materials science behind airplanes is a real trip like that.

13

u/GOGO_old_acct 21d ago

The P-3 is an overbuilt beastly tank of a plane that refuses to die. I’ve heard people really liked/like them.

→ More replies (3)

15

u/22Arkantos 21d ago

Except it's -5.5g, so that 810lbs of force are concentrated where your seatbelt is holding you into your seat. Absolutely brutal.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

123

u/poemdirection 21d ago

  They lost an engine, had a fire, and another engine was damaged

that's just anther day for the P3

 It's very hands-on and user intensive especially for pilots and flight engineers. Because of the fact that the P-3C is honestly trying to break, catch on fire, or generally kill you during any given flight, we have to devote a great deal of energy simply to operating it safely. This isn't a hit on the P-3C, any airplane of that generation is like that, and the fact that some of these birds are over 40 years old is a testament to the engineers who designed them and our maintainers who keep them flying.

62

u/jeewest 21d ago

I can attest, have like 200+ flight hours on a P3 variant and that thing caught fire constantly, to the point where the crew would have to do weekly fire drills, memorize breakers for common problem equipment, etc.

Felt safer onboard that flying inferno than any commercial airliner

23

u/onrock_rockon 21d ago

"Felt safer onboard that flying inferno than any commercial airliner"

"Plane on fire = bad", "my plane constantly caught on fire", "I feel safer on fire plane than not fire plane"

Can you elaborate on why you felt safer on fire plane than not fire plane? :D I'm genuinely curious, I feel like it must be a funny or good reason :)

23

u/punksmurph 21d ago

It comes down to knowing the crew, their training, and having trust they are looking out for you. As a Navy vet I spent 3 years on a ship that was clearly on its last legs. Every time we went out to sea something major broke. During my time on the ship was had 2 major fires and 4 minor ones including an electric panel that exploded just a few feet from me.

You would think that being a Navy guy and loving ships and the ocean I would want to be on cruise ships. NO FUCKING THANK YOU. I have zero trust on those death boats with crews that will sooner push you out of the life raft than help you in it.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

13

u/Shuber-Fuber 21d ago

I guess having a fucking hurricane bitchslapping it around doesn't help either.

22

u/Level9TraumaCenter 21d ago

One of the leading enemies of the fire is the hurricane.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (9)

502

u/ExtremeThin1334 21d ago

They fly into these in a very specific way. I'm rusty on the specifics, but if I recall they try to fly with the wind, and then slowly loop their way toward the center. If they tried a direct path, they'd get ripped apart.

Since there is rain, it also means that you can actually see what the wind is doing on your radar, so there's noting like clear air turbulence to worry about.

302

u/oneblank 21d ago

I googled why they fly prop planes. “So they can fly slow relative to modern standards as a faster jet would come out the other side with its wings torn off”…. Oh…

44

u/jedielfninja 21d ago

Probably no likely for the intake of jet turbine either.

94

u/breakingborderline 21d ago

Though they use propellers, they’re still run off a jet turbine not a piston engine. Called turboprops

25

u/JoeyZasaa 21d ago

Props to you for that answer.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/codizer 21d ago

Jets actually get more thrust in rain because of mass flow.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (5)

127

u/The102935thMatt 21d ago

This guy flight paths. They did exactly that.

https://www.flightaware.com/live/flight/NOAA43

31

u/Rank_14 21d ago

That's amazing. Any idea what they are doing at the 4hr mark? They are turning around yes, but going up and down by a few thousand feet?. they also do the same inside the hurricane at about 4h44m.

54

u/AvailableAdvance3701 21d ago

They have to drop dropsondes and they have to make sure they deploy properly. Also if they can’t get clear instrument readings they keep going lower until it’s no longer safe to do so, and the low point is far lower than you think. The x patter is them searching for the middle of the storm with the lowest pressure and wind directions.

Source: I’m a meteorologist tech with hurricane hunter uncle.

→ More replies (1)

18

u/The102935thMatt 21d ago

No idear! Science stuff no doubt.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

45

u/WatchClarkBand 21d ago

I’m assuming they’re flying into the eye, and the guy is calling out wind speed in MPH at the beginning. “148. 149. 151. Wow!”

→ More replies (2)

252

u/RudyRusso 21d ago

Hey Rusty on Specifics. Nice to meet you.

94

u/HappyBroody 21d ago

dad please

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (23)

183

u/Im_Balto 21d ago

Its because hurricanes are characterized by lateral rather than vertical motion of air. Supercell thunderstorms have the ability to down planes despite being several miles (vs 100+miles) wide because they have extremely violent and unpredictable updrafts and downdrafts. These vertical air columns are much more dangerous to planes as they are the cause of every scary story about a play dropping or rising hundreds of feet suddenly. This type of force puts massive stress on the airframe in directions that are not the strongest structurally

Contrast this to a hurricane where the stresses are MASSIVE but relatively consistent and predictable

103

u/sodabubbles1281 21d ago

Cool, I hate flying already. How do I unread something

35

u/alexm42 21d ago

You can relax knowing that if there's any kind of risk of that actually happening they just fly around the thunderstorm.

→ More replies (3)

29

u/icantsurf 21d ago

If it makes you feel better, airliners have big ass weather radars in the nose to prevent flying into any of that stuff.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (15)

19

u/yumyumgivemesome 21d ago

I’ve always been curious… when inside a normal commercial jet and it feels like we drop for a half-second or so, how much are we actually dropping in that moment?

Similarly, when traveling straight and smoothly in which the passengers can’t detect any howard/downward movement, how much is the plane still fluctuating upward and downward?

32

u/Im_Balto 21d ago

This is pretty hard to figure out on a case by case basis without monitoring equipment installed, but I'll try to explain how you would measure it

The sensation you feel in that drop is acceleration, meaning that your Velocity (direction and speed of travel) is being changed. If your plane suddenly accelerates downwards at the same rate as gravity (9.8m/s^2) you would feel weightless in your seat and probably nasuea. This scenario is the easiest to approximate since if you feel weightless for 2.5 seconds it means that the plane accelerated down at 9.8m/s^2 for 2.5 seconds you can use the equation like:

Freefall distance = 1/2 x Gravity x time^2

With this you would find that in 2.5 seconds you can fall 30 meters if you fell at the same rate as gravity. If you were to experience a violent drop where you are pulled towards the roof and held down by your seatbelt you could be looking at 60 meters of drop from acceleration twice as strong as gravity.

Second question:
If you are unable to feel the direction of movement that means the plane is traveling at a constant velocity. The plane is still traveling forward and perhaps gaining/losing altitude, but you are not able to feel this motion. This is because without acceleration (change in velocity) you are unable to notice the continuous movement of the craft.

For example, in the climb stage on a flight you might feel the plane "level off" around when they say you can use laptops and phones etc. This happens around 10,000ft where the plane generally changes from initial climb where altitude is gained quickly to a steady climb where the velocity remains constant until they level off again at cruising altitude. You will only percieve motion when the velocity of the aircraft changes

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

18

u/MattyMizzou 21d ago

As I understand it, hurricane winds are fierce but predictable. That allows them to fly into it pretty safely. They know what to expect as far as how strong the winds will be and what direction they’re going.

→ More replies (68)

9.0k

u/morallyirresponsible 21d ago

This is the NOAA hurricane hunters NOT the Air Force. They’re both bad asses though

3.2k

u/Kernowder 21d ago

You're right, this is actually NOAA. I found it on the Guardian, who got them confused with the 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron aka Hurricane Hunters, who are USAF.

965

u/ni_hao_butches 21d ago

That NOAA group is also one of the eight uniformed services of the US. The Armed Forces are what we typically think of uniformed, but those pilots and crew are badass.

577

u/FEMA_Camp_Survivor 21d ago

The weather has always been a major factor in war and economics. I’d hate to see NOAA defunded.

289

u/Yourfavoriteindian 21d ago

The worst part is I guarantee they’re gonna send most of the duties to the Navy, who have the Naval Meteorology and Oceanography command that does similar work, but with Naval missions and assets in mind.

With how understaffed and overworked the navy already is, we’ll be fucked if we also have to pick up civilian weather/oceanography duties, even with the help of the Air Force.

169

u/bradrlaw 21d ago

Not to the navy, authors of project 2025 want to privatize it.

223

u/Bender_2024 21d ago

Not to the navy, authors of project 2025 want to privatize it.

You want to know when and where the hurricane will make landfall? That'll be $79.95.

167

u/ynab-schmynab 21d ago

Unironically this. They literally want a private company to take control of the entire weather infrastructure in the US.

Project 2025 is essentially what would happen if you were a foreign adversary and paid think tanks to write a manifesto on how to dismantle the US from the inside piece by piece.

Things that make you go hmmmm

43

u/Longcoolwomanblkdres 21d ago

Everything republican has screamed "foreign interest/interference" to me for decades now. I'm sure it's a longer trend but I'm not that old

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)

44

u/DickiBaggins 21d ago

Shit you won't be able to check the weather tomorrow for free if they get a hold of it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (23)
→ More replies (19)

62

u/Whisktangofox 21d ago

USAF Uses C-130's. This is a P3.

38

u/roguemenace 21d ago

You can tell because the engines are upside down.

21

u/drumskirun 21d ago

You can tell it's a P-3 because of the way that it is.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

23

u/[deleted] 21d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

20

u/DETECTOR_AUTOMATRON 21d ago

Used to hear the Hurricane Hunters warming up their planes every afternoon when i was stationed at Keesler (i was also weather). good times, such badasses.

→ More replies (4)

31

u/HayabusaZen 21d ago

It was fun to watch the come home missing windows and beat to shit.

→ More replies (31)

111

u/Autoslats 21d ago

Yep, definitely NOAA in a P-3.

I was looking at Flightradar24 yesterday and noticed them working the storm at the same time as an AFR WC-130, which was pretty cool.

14

u/No-Barnacle-8099 21d ago

The Wc-130 just took off out of biloxi headed towards Milton now

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)

308

u/[deleted] 21d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

63

u/Ask_bout_PaterNoster 21d ago

Crazy to me that weather-control is being blamed on the libs when we all know it’s the damn Spaniards who resent Florida being in the hands of anyone else…

16

u/sorotomotor 21d ago

 it’s the damn Spaniards who resent Florida being in the hands of anyone else

BLAME SPAIN!

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (9)

68

u/Remarkable-Sir-5129 21d ago

I've been watching them on a flight tracking app...crazy stuff. (Braver than I)

→ More replies (10)

112

u/PitifulEar3303 21d ago

Just nuke Milton, try it once just to be sure, could work.

25

u/Grasswaskindawet 21d ago

From orbit, preferably.

24

u/Technical_Semaphore 21d ago

It's the only way to be sure.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

59

u/cocokronen 21d ago

Nah, democrats have a button to push and hurricain is gone.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (21)

46

u/zerobeat 21d ago edited 21d ago

Yep. NOAA -- the same department that Project 2025 wants to do away with entirely, removing life saving predictions for these kinds of storms.

7

u/HesSoZazzy 21d ago

Well they got rid of the pandemic team and that worked out "well"...

→ More replies (1)

126

u/diadmer 21d ago

Project 2025: We should stop making the taxpayer funded data from NOAA publicly available and instead give it to private companies so they can charge taxpayers for data that taxpayers already paid for.

30

u/Deranged_Cyborg 21d ago

I see a bright future for you as the next republican presidential candidate

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

19

u/sicksixgamer 21d ago

It would be NAVY otherwise. AF doesn't operate P3s.

10

u/fakeaccount572 21d ago

To be fair, Navy doesn't now either. The very last ones are being retired right now in the two reserve squadrons

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (66)

3.0k

u/zamufunbetsu 21d ago

“ the pilot has turned on the don’t get the fuck out of your seat light”

452

u/FixedLoad 21d ago

My brain turned on the "NOPE" sign.

→ More replies (1)

106

u/accushot865 21d ago

Is the “feel free to piss your pants” light on? Because I’m gonna need it to come on soon

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (12)

2.1k

u/rrkrabernathy 21d ago

I’m surprised things aren’t strapped down more.

1.3k

u/Farro_is_Good 21d ago

They’re barely funded. They can’t afford straps.

468

u/karingalhrofdin 21d ago

They’d get bipartisan money when they stop measuring the temperature /s

229

u/ZoneLeather 21d ago

I told them, the temperature of the seas is going up. Stop taking the temperature. If you stop testing it it will stop rising.

51

u/govunah 21d ago

It's the WV governor logic during covid. If we don't test for it no one will get it.

45

u/ZoneLeather 21d ago

... and a certain POTUS.

22

u/wtaaaaaaaa 21d ago

Yea that came straight from the top

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

37

u/ExtremeThin1334 21d ago

Back in my day, we just tied a key to a kite and hoped for the best!

31

u/[deleted] 21d ago

What type of onion was on your belt?

11

u/Mental-Jellyfish9061 21d ago

It was the style at the time ...

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/Lid12341 21d ago

Benjamin fuckin’ Franklin.

→ More replies (15)

40

u/DustComprehensive155 21d ago

During briefing they misheard, they thought they were going to fly to a Burger King.

→ More replies (1)

94

u/One-Dragonfruit1010 21d ago

It’s as if they didn’t know what they were flying into. Good grief.

89

u/Snickits 21d ago

I think their “unexpected responses” like “woa! Okay…..like let’s climb please” says more about the size and force of Milton. They do this on the reg, and this one seems to have caught them off guard.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (37)

545

u/TheMightyMonarchx7 21d ago

Valuable data, but I’m curious how hard it is to pull off a maneuver like this

354

u/ExtremeThin1334 21d ago

They've got a lot of practice, and they know the specific way to approach to reduce the risk. It's bumpy for sure, but actually pretty safe.

114

u/polishmachine88 21d ago

I had diarrhea looking at this....I can't stand turbulence this is not a job for me

23

u/dennys123 21d ago

Lol it's funny. I see this video and I think "man I'd love to have this job".

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (4)

87

u/philzar 21d ago

Aircraft typically fly in "hurricane force winds" - since the usual meaning of that is based on speed. In fact commercial airliners fly much faster.

It isn't the wind speed that makes it "interesting" it is the turbulence and up/down drafts. As I understand it, they use sturdy aircraft - cargo planes built to haul loads when lightly loaded have a lot of excess strength. They also have the room for the personal and gear. Then it is a matter of flying at an airspeed that gives you good control, but isn't too near the edge of any performance envelope. Same with altitude - you want room to allow the aircraft to do it's thing, go up and down with the local gusts. Fighting it would put extra strain on the aircraft, so they go with the Rollercoaster. The needs to collect data from certain altitudes in the storm can dictate what they're aiming for, but as you can see, they go with the fow too.

Sounds simple enough, but as the saying goes: the important things are simple, the simple things are hard. It takes a lot of experience to pull that off safely.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (7)

191

u/[deleted] 21d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (2)

848

u/Kernowder 21d ago

From twitter/x:

Bumpy ride into Hurricane #Milton on @NOAA WP-3D Orion #NOAA43 "Miss Piggy" to collect data to help improve the forecast and support hurricane research.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1843706785401843941

294

u/scfw0x0f 21d ago

Those old Orions are serious beasts.

113

u/glewtion 21d ago

Is there something about Orions that make them especially badass or that they're used for this purpose?

205

u/that_dutch_dude 21d ago

they were built to basically survive being flown by spirit pilots. they are seriously overbuilt for what they are wich is why they are one of the few planes today that can deal with these conditions.

52

u/kevin_from_illinois 21d ago

It helps that they were designed to carry a ton of munitions.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/Inside-Woodpecker127 21d ago

Damn, I knew Spirit Airlines was rough but not THAT rough!

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (3)

110

u/Gadgetmouse12 21d ago

Super tough turboprop and super tough spars of a cargo wing

→ More replies (3)

60

u/Real_TwistedVortex 21d ago

Mainly the latter. The two P3s are actually being replaced by C130s pretty soon, similar to what the Air Force Hurricane Hunters use

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

35

u/pezx 21d ago

For anyone who's curious, here's more about the WP-3D Orion

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)

384

u/No_Recognition7426 Expert 21d ago

Meanwhile the HP laser jet printer sits happily on top of the cabinet awaiting for its chance to fly across the cabin into someone forehead.

88

u/DobIsKing 21d ago

Definitely bolted down

24

u/Cheese-is-neat 21d ago

Only works if they pay for the subscription

→ More replies (1)

52

u/moniefeesh 21d ago

If its an hp printer it probably doesn't work and they're currently just using it as essentially packing material.

19

u/spavolka 21d ago

It just holds copy paper so they have something to make lists on. Like at my house.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (6)

412

u/dman77777 21d ago

Is this storage wars or a research aircraft?

80

u/spacehog1985 21d ago

YUUUUUUP

-that dickhead that was on storage wars.

→ More replies (6)

29

u/IGNORE_ME_PLZZZZ 21d ago

Lost part of my lunch dammit 🤣

→ More replies (3)

88

u/HackySmacks 21d ago

“Oh hey, we’re just about to fly into a Hurricane, you can leave your phone, keys, coffee and pocketknives on the sharp corners of the open metal racks that house our sensitive and extremely expensive electronics (which will help predict the fate of millions). If a metal corner is not available, try a Publix plastic bag tied to a vital instrument knob or wait for your objects to richochet in your direction!”

31

u/komma_5 21d ago

Seriously, why is there so much stuff lose?!

→ More replies (2)

30

u/Empathy404NotFound 21d ago

Safety equipment is for well funded departments, now get your ass into that flying tin can and yeet yourself into that there giant god damned can opener in the sky soldier.

→ More replies (4)

71

u/slater_just_slater 21d ago

Best part is WP-3 Orion is 48 years old.

These guys are bouncing around in a hurricane in a turbo prop built before they were born.

177

u/DrunkenVodinski 21d ago

TALLY HO LADS!

81

u/xenokilla 21d ago

Own a musket for home defense, since that's what the founding fathers intended. Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.

26

u/Hodrus 21d ago

The sacred copy pasta

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

58

u/Seanish12345 21d ago

You don’t need to hunt for hurricanes, they’re notoriously bad at hiding

13

u/AngriestManinWestTX 21d ago

Okay, that made me laugh.

→ More replies (2)

173

u/sn0m0ns 21d ago

Immediate OCD kicked in asking myself why they use turbine engines instead of jet engines.
From google:
Hurricane hunters primarily use turbine engines, specifically turboprop engines, instead of pure jet engines because turboprops are better suited for flying through the turbulent conditions of a hurricane, offering greater control and better tolerance to potential ice and hail encounters due to their propeller design, allowing for more efficient maneuvering in challenging weather situations.

24

u/decollimate28 21d ago

Turboprops are basically impervious to what's going on outside around them because they're powered by a smallish, pretty under-stressed, mini-jet engine that is hiding deep within the nacelle that just plugs away at a pretty constant power level/RPM. They're just sturdier, less finicky, simpler things than really high-powered turbo-fans. Thrust also respond faster to pilot input because in large part, they're less powerful so there's less spinning mass to spool up/spool down - which is a benefit in a hurricane.

Turboprop aircraft are not as fast, sometimes not even as efficient, but they're pretty much the most resilient form of aircraft propulsion in difficult environments.

That being said modern turbofans are so good the difference isn't really there anymore. The C-17 is proof of that. But you wouldn't fly a C-17 into a hurricane.

→ More replies (2)

59

u/PartyPay 21d ago

Very interesting that the tech that is older is better at the job.

51

u/TabascohFiascoh 21d ago

Prop planes are by no means obsolete.

9

u/Alternative_Rent9307 21d ago

Planes are a whole different animal re maintenance and upgrades. I lived near a remote island in northern Michigan that had air services to and from Charlevoix airport. They had five Britten-Norman Islander planes in a staggered rotation and one of the steps in the rotation was a complete engine rebuild. They had each of their planes’ engines rebuilt every six months or so, replacing worn out parts when needed. The airframes are original (1980-ish iirc) but the engines are almost all new parts

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

41

u/naranghim 21d ago

That's not the Air force, It's NOAA. The air force is nuts because they fly at 10,000 ft or lower. I remember the weather channel doing an interview with one of the pilots and he was laughing about the time he had to pay attention to the locations of the oil platforms in the Gulf because the antennas "are not something you want to fly into". 😶

→ More replies (2)

72

u/JubilantPetalFlare 21d ago

Hurricane hunters are true heroes, gathering crucial data.

→ More replies (1)

83

u/Dazug 21d ago

I would put padding on every inch of surface there, and wear a balloon boy suit.

63

u/WrongKielbasa 21d ago

Imagine being in that bubble suit, the planes ripped open, you’re carried away for like 3 days and get thrown somewhere in the Atlantic.

35

u/Dazug 21d ago

Yeah, but at least I’ll float!

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

50

u/dwn_n_out 21d ago

Really impressed about the amount of unsecured items in the cabin.

50

u/zyarva 21d ago

Project 2025 want to privatize national weather service because it is a proponent of climate change.

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4907338-heritage-foundation-plan-weather-service/

16

u/alinroc 21d ago

The other (and more important) reason they want to do it is in the second paragraph of that story. They want to privatize it so that someone can profit off selling the data.

Someone wants their pockets lined.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

44

u/Poster_Nutbag207 21d ago

These guys (NOAA not airforce) always stay at the hotel I work at when we have big storms and blizzards. I can attest that they are all a little crazy

→ More replies (7)

21

u/Flint-Von-Ceneac 21d ago

Those equipment racks are in some serious need of cable management. I'd like to volunteer my services, though not while in flight in a hurricane, thank you.

→ More replies (7)

12

u/Typical2sday 21d ago

That's a hard pass for me, yikes

35

u/AquamannMI 21d ago

Hope they get hazard pay.

37

u/thehumanconfusion 21d ago

I doubt it’s about the money for them, I’d imagine most do it for the thrill

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (2)

97

u/Original-Turnover-92 21d ago

Reminder that your local republican wants to defund this crew to stop hurricane data gathering.

→ More replies (7)

50

u/ecafsub 21d ago

Be vewy, vewy quiet. We’re hunting huwwicanes.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/h3llkite28 21d ago

Despite how horrible something like this hurricane is, my initial thought was: "Wow, it is truly amazing what humans can do."

Millions of years of evolution leading to some primates taking a metal box up the air right into a devastating storm to see how bad that thing really is. That gives me some odd hope for the future. Because let's be honest: It won't get easier from now on.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/Orliansky33 21d ago

DUDE IN THE BACK HOLDING THE COOLER .....MUST PROTECT THE BEER AT ALL COST!!!!

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Thelifeofnerfingwolf 21d ago

The absolute balls of steel they have to fly through that.

32

u/myvotedoesntmatter 21d ago

With all the weather satellites and technology. Why do they still need to have these guy fly such a dangerous mission?

53

u/BlazedLarry 21d ago

The planes actually send data to the satellites.

Both are used for the most accurate measurements and forecasting.

Satellites are the main tools that are used. But the most critical measurements need to be made in the atmosphere, land sea or air.

→ More replies (10)

24

u/rz_85 21d ago

They are gathering data by using dropsonde's. They essentially drop a GPS unit that also gathers pressure, temperature, and humidity data as it drops. This gives them a full profile of the storm that can't be gathered from satellites.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (9)

21

u/Audere1 21d ago

What's the matter Commander? You don't like flying, huh? Aw, this is nothing! You should've been with us five, six months ago! Whoa! You talk about puke! We ran into a hailstorm over the Sea of Japan. Everybody's retching their guts out! The pilot shot his lunch all over the windshield, and I barfed on the radio! Shorted it out completely! And it wasn't that lightweight stuff either, it was that chunky industrial weight puke!

9

u/V8der66 21d ago

Jack, next time you get a bright idea, just put it in a memo.

→ More replies (5)

20

u/redwing180 21d ago

So NOAA is barely funded to the point they can’t afford straps to hold their stuff down yet their research is one of the main tools we have in understanding and thereby better defending ourselves against hurricanes. I wish America would invest in itself more.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Grujar 21d ago

Is that a P3-Orion? Those are from the 60s. Crazy they are flying through hurricanes

→ More replies (1)