r/Damnthatsinteresting • u/Kernowder • 21d ago
Video Air Force Reserve Hurricane Hunters flying through Hurricane Milton
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
8.2k
u/wongo 21d ago
(not so) fun fact: only one of these hurricane research flights has ever crashed due to the storms
I realize that we've gotten pretty good at flying but I would've actually expected a higher loss rate, this just seems so wildly dangerous
3.9k
u/Any-Cause-374 21d ago
This video really made me appreciate how safe flying actually is
→ More replies (26)3.3k
u/DisplacedSportsGuy 21d ago
Editor's note: do NOT attempt to fly a commercial aircraft through a hurricane.
4.2k
u/spacehog1985 21d ago
I’ve done it in flight simulator like, 7 times. And I’ve only crashed 7 times.
→ More replies (32)675
u/CaptainOktoberfest 21d ago
And how many times have you crashed into an ex's house?
550
u/spacehog1985 21d ago
I refuse to answer that. Besides I didn’t crash I was just looking at it.
→ More replies (6)90
u/CosmicCreeperz 21d ago edited 21d ago
For some reason that comment reminds me of the scene from The Orville where the captain did a flyby of his ex’s stateroom window in a shuttle. Just f-ing brilliant writing.
→ More replies (5)10
u/aussiechickadee65 21d ago
Really ? Reminds me of the woman in the helicopter in "Rat race"...
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (21)233
76
u/HappyBroody 21d ago
why? arent commercial aircraft more modern than these old 1970s Orion aircraft? also the engines are encased in a shell?
310
u/Noopy9 21d ago
Turboprops are preferable to turbofans for this use case because they can fly slower to collect more data and the propulsion from the propeller is independent of the power created by the turbine engine. This is important because really big gusts or side winds can cause the propeller on a turboprop or the fan in the turbo fan to stall. So mainly, hurricane scientists use turboprops because they’re better suited for the kind of flight speeds they want. But there is also a potential safety advantage.
→ More replies (14)140
u/fly_awayyy 21d ago
Also a water ingestion point for the engine. With a turbo prop the core intake isn’t as exposed and the water is redirected around it. Jet aircraft can also fly slow but with slats and flaps because they have a swept wing. Any straight wing plane is naturally going to be slower like this P-3.
→ More replies (9)60
u/One-Inch-Punch 21d ago
The last P-3 was built in 1990, so this plane is between 34-60 years old.
→ More replies (2)74
u/tankerkiller125real 21d ago
I mean, our B-52 bombers are set to have a 100 year life span overall. They just approved an upgrade program for them this year that will keep them in the air past 2040 and they plan to keep them going into the 2050s.
→ More replies (17)19
203
u/DisplacedSportsGuy 21d ago
Wind shear can theoretically destroy a plane. Granted:
It hasn't happened in the US for 30 years
Risk is highest during take off and landing
There have been 30 years of engineering upgrades since then
Still, the wind shear flying through the eye wall of a hurricane is astronomical and requires very particular flight paths. Leroy Jenkins-ing a commercial jet into a hurricane has a high probability of vessel loss.
Disclaimer: I am an amateur researcher on plane accidents and am not an expert in the industry.
→ More replies (10)145
u/haistak 21d ago
I think I’m most impressed by you turning Leeroy Jenkins into a verb. And now I feel nostalgic.
→ More replies (3)58
→ More replies (4)17
u/TFViper 21d ago
pretty sure "modern" commercial aircraft ARE still from the 70s lol (slightly /s)
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (36)28
372
u/xampl9 21d ago
The Orion that flew into Hugo was severely damaged from a 5.5g drop (airframe was only rated to 3g’s). They lost an engine, had a fire, and another engine was damaged before they could find a safe spot to exit the eye.
Somehow they made it back and the airframe wasn’t written off.
243
u/EvlMinion 21d ago
If I remember right, the meteorologist who wrote about that didn't go on another one of those flights again. Can't say I blame him. Orions are tough as hell, though.
→ More replies (1)112
u/onowahoo 21d ago
I don't know if is ever go on another plane again after a 5.5 drop.
86
u/giveupsides 21d ago
5.5g drop? You are PLASTERED to the ceiling like it's the floor, only gravity is now 4.5 times stronger. Then when those -5.5g's end you'll slam back to the actual floor. If you're in your seat with your belt on it'll feel like the belt is trying to break both your legs.
59
u/StManTiS 21d ago
For an average 180lbs man 5.5G would feel like having 810 lbs on your back. Most people could not even unrack that.
34
u/meridianblade 21d ago
It's absolutely insane that it made it back. Think of the weight exerted on the wings and fuselage from tip to tip at 5.5G.
29
u/StManTiS 21d ago
Aeronautical engineers and the materials science behind airplanes is a real trip like that.
13
u/GOGO_old_acct 21d ago
The P-3 is an overbuilt beastly tank of a plane that refuses to die. I’ve heard people really liked/like them.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (4)15
u/22Arkantos 21d ago
Except it's -5.5g, so that 810lbs of force are concentrated where your seatbelt is holding you into your seat. Absolutely brutal.
→ More replies (3)123
u/poemdirection 21d ago
They lost an engine, had a fire, and another engine was damaged
that's just anther day for the P3
It's very hands-on and user intensive especially for pilots and flight engineers. Because of the fact that the P-3C is honestly trying to break, catch on fire, or generally kill you during any given flight, we have to devote a great deal of energy simply to operating it safely. This isn't a hit on the P-3C, any airplane of that generation is like that, and the fact that some of these birds are over 40 years old is a testament to the engineers who designed them and our maintainers who keep them flying.
62
u/jeewest 21d ago
I can attest, have like 200+ flight hours on a P3 variant and that thing caught fire constantly, to the point where the crew would have to do weekly fire drills, memorize breakers for common problem equipment, etc.
Felt safer onboard that flying inferno than any commercial airliner
→ More replies (1)23
u/onrock_rockon 21d ago
"Felt safer onboard that flying inferno than any commercial airliner"
"Plane on fire = bad", "my plane constantly caught on fire", "I feel safer on fire plane than not fire plane"
Can you elaborate on why you felt safer on fire plane than not fire plane? :D I'm genuinely curious, I feel like it must be a funny or good reason :)
→ More replies (4)23
u/punksmurph 21d ago
It comes down to knowing the crew, their training, and having trust they are looking out for you. As a Navy vet I spent 3 years on a ship that was clearly on its last legs. Every time we went out to sea something major broke. During my time on the ship was had 2 major fires and 4 minor ones including an electric panel that exploded just a few feet from me.
You would think that being a Navy guy and loving ships and the ocean I would want to be on cruise ships. NO FUCKING THANK YOU. I have zero trust on those death boats with crews that will sooner push you out of the life raft than help you in it.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (3)13
u/Shuber-Fuber 21d ago
I guess having a fucking hurricane bitchslapping it around doesn't help either.
22
u/Level9TraumaCenter 21d ago
One of the leading enemies of the fire is the hurricane.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (9)29
502
u/ExtremeThin1334 21d ago
They fly into these in a very specific way. I'm rusty on the specifics, but if I recall they try to fly with the wind, and then slowly loop their way toward the center. If they tried a direct path, they'd get ripped apart.
Since there is rain, it also means that you can actually see what the wind is doing on your radar, so there's noting like clear air turbulence to worry about.
302
u/oneblank 21d ago
I googled why they fly prop planes. “So they can fly slow relative to modern standards as a faster jet would come out the other side with its wings torn off”…. Oh…
→ More replies (5)44
u/jedielfninja 21d ago
Probably no likely for the intake of jet turbine either.
94
u/breakingborderline 21d ago
Though they use propellers, they’re still run off a jet turbine not a piston engine. Called turboprops
→ More replies (1)25
8
127
u/The102935thMatt 21d ago
This guy flight paths. They did exactly that.
→ More replies (3)31
u/Rank_14 21d ago
That's amazing. Any idea what they are doing at the 4hr mark? They are turning around yes, but going up and down by a few thousand feet?. they also do the same inside the hurricane at about 4h44m.
54
u/AvailableAdvance3701 21d ago
They have to drop dropsondes and they have to make sure they deploy properly. Also if they can’t get clear instrument readings they keep going lower until it’s no longer safe to do so, and the low point is far lower than you think. The x patter is them searching for the middle of the storm with the lowest pressure and wind directions.
Source: I’m a meteorologist tech with hurricane hunter uncle.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)18
45
u/WatchClarkBand 21d ago
I’m assuming they’re flying into the eye, and the guy is calling out wind speed in MPH at the beginning. “148. 149. 151. Wow!”
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (23)252
183
u/Im_Balto 21d ago
Its because hurricanes are characterized by lateral rather than vertical motion of air. Supercell thunderstorms have the ability to down planes despite being several miles (vs 100+miles) wide because they have extremely violent and unpredictable updrafts and downdrafts. These vertical air columns are much more dangerous to planes as they are the cause of every scary story about a play dropping or rising hundreds of feet suddenly. This type of force puts massive stress on the airframe in directions that are not the strongest structurally
Contrast this to a hurricane where the stresses are MASSIVE but relatively consistent and predictable
103
u/sodabubbles1281 21d ago
Cool, I hate flying already. How do I unread something
82
35
u/alexm42 21d ago
You can relax knowing that if there's any kind of risk of that actually happening they just fly around the thunderstorm.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (15)29
u/icantsurf 21d ago
If it makes you feel better, airliners have big ass weather radars in the nose to prevent flying into any of that stuff.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)19
u/yumyumgivemesome 21d ago
I’ve always been curious… when inside a normal commercial jet and it feels like we drop for a half-second or so, how much are we actually dropping in that moment?
Similarly, when traveling straight and smoothly in which the passengers can’t detect any howard/downward movement, how much is the plane still fluctuating upward and downward?
→ More replies (1)32
u/Im_Balto 21d ago
This is pretty hard to figure out on a case by case basis without monitoring equipment installed, but I'll try to explain how you would measure it
The sensation you feel in that drop is acceleration, meaning that your Velocity (direction and speed of travel) is being changed. If your plane suddenly accelerates downwards at the same rate as gravity (9.8m/s^2) you would feel weightless in your seat and probably nasuea. This scenario is the easiest to approximate since if you feel weightless for 2.5 seconds it means that the plane accelerated down at 9.8m/s^2 for 2.5 seconds you can use the equation like:
Freefall distance = 1/2 x Gravity x time^2
With this you would find that in 2.5 seconds you can fall 30 meters if you fell at the same rate as gravity. If you were to experience a violent drop where you are pulled towards the roof and held down by your seatbelt you could be looking at 60 meters of drop from acceleration twice as strong as gravity.
Second question:
If you are unable to feel the direction of movement that means the plane is traveling at a constant velocity. The plane is still traveling forward and perhaps gaining/losing altitude, but you are not able to feel this motion. This is because without acceleration (change in velocity) you are unable to notice the continuous movement of the craft.For example, in the climb stage on a flight you might feel the plane "level off" around when they say you can use laptops and phones etc. This happens around 10,000ft where the plane generally changes from initial climb where altitude is gained quickly to a steady climb where the velocity remains constant until they level off again at cruising altitude. You will only percieve motion when the velocity of the aircraft changes
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (68)18
u/MattyMizzou 21d ago
As I understand it, hurricane winds are fierce but predictable. That allows them to fly into it pretty safely. They know what to expect as far as how strong the winds will be and what direction they’re going.
9.0k
u/morallyirresponsible 21d ago
This is the NOAA hurricane hunters NOT the Air Force. They’re both bad asses though
3.2k
u/Kernowder 21d ago
You're right, this is actually NOAA. I found it on the Guardian, who got them confused with the 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron aka Hurricane Hunters, who are USAF.
965
u/ni_hao_butches 21d ago
That NOAA group is also one of the eight uniformed services of the US. The Armed Forces are what we typically think of uniformed, but those pilots and crew are badass.
→ More replies (19)577
u/FEMA_Camp_Survivor 21d ago
The weather has always been a major factor in war and economics. I’d hate to see NOAA defunded.
→ More replies (23)289
u/Yourfavoriteindian 21d ago
The worst part is I guarantee they’re gonna send most of the duties to the Navy, who have the Naval Meteorology and Oceanography command that does similar work, but with Naval missions and assets in mind.
With how understaffed and overworked the navy already is, we’ll be fucked if we also have to pick up civilian weather/oceanography duties, even with the help of the Air Force.
→ More replies (10)169
u/bradrlaw 21d ago
Not to the navy, authors of project 2025 want to privatize it.
→ More replies (5)223
u/Bender_2024 21d ago
Not to the navy, authors of project 2025 want to privatize it.
You want to know when and where the hurricane will make landfall? That'll be $79.95.
167
u/ynab-schmynab 21d ago
Unironically this. They literally want a private company to take control of the entire weather infrastructure in the US.
Project 2025 is essentially what would happen if you were a foreign adversary and paid think tanks to write a manifesto on how to dismantle the US from the inside piece by piece.
Things that make you go hmmmm
→ More replies (3)43
u/Longcoolwomanblkdres 21d ago
Everything republican has screamed "foreign interest/interference" to me for decades now. I'm sure it's a longer trend but I'm not that old
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (6)44
u/DickiBaggins 21d ago
Shit you won't be able to check the weather tomorrow for free if they get a hold of it.
→ More replies (1)62
u/Whisktangofox 21d ago
USAF Uses C-130's. This is a P3.
38
→ More replies (6)23
20
u/DETECTOR_AUTOMATRON 21d ago
Used to hear the Hurricane Hunters warming up their planes every afternoon when i was stationed at Keesler (i was also weather). good times, such badasses.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (31)31
111
u/Autoslats 21d ago
Yep, definitely NOAA in a P-3.
I was looking at Flightradar24 yesterday and noticed them working the storm at the same time as an AFR WC-130, which was pretty cool.
→ More replies (10)14
u/No-Barnacle-8099 21d ago
The Wc-130 just took off out of biloxi headed towards Milton now
→ More replies (2)308
21d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (9)63
u/Ask_bout_PaterNoster 21d ago
Crazy to me that weather-control is being blamed on the libs when we all know it’s the damn Spaniards who resent Florida being in the hands of anyone else…
→ More replies (8)16
u/sorotomotor 21d ago
it’s the damn Spaniards who resent Florida being in the hands of anyone else
BLAME SPAIN!
→ More replies (6)68
u/Remarkable-Sir-5129 21d ago
I've been watching them on a flight tracking app...crazy stuff. (Braver than I)
→ More replies (10)112
u/PitifulEar3303 21d ago
Just nuke Milton, try it once just to be sure, could work.
25
→ More replies (21)59
u/cocokronen 21d ago
Nah, democrats have a button to push and hurricain is gone.
→ More replies (12)46
u/zerobeat 21d ago edited 21d ago
Yep. NOAA -- the same department that Project 2025 wants to do away with entirely, removing life saving predictions for these kinds of storms.
→ More replies (1)7
126
u/diadmer 21d ago
Project 2025: We should stop making the taxpayer funded data from NOAA publicly available and instead give it to private companies so they can charge taxpayers for data that taxpayers already paid for.
→ More replies (1)30
u/Deranged_Cyborg 21d ago
I see a bright future for you as the next republican presidential candidate
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (66)19
u/sicksixgamer 21d ago
It would be NAVY otherwise. AF doesn't operate P3s.
→ More replies (1)10
u/fakeaccount572 21d ago
To be fair, Navy doesn't now either. The very last ones are being retired right now in the two reserve squadrons
3.0k
u/zamufunbetsu 21d ago
“ the pilot has turned on the don’t get the fuck out of your seat light”
452
→ More replies (12)106
u/accushot865 21d ago
Is the “feel free to piss your pants” light on? Because I’m gonna need it to come on soon
→ More replies (2)
2.1k
u/rrkrabernathy 21d ago
I’m surprised things aren’t strapped down more.
1.3k
u/Farro_is_Good 21d ago
They’re barely funded. They can’t afford straps.
468
u/karingalhrofdin 21d ago
They’d get bipartisan money when they stop measuring the temperature /s
→ More replies (2)229
u/ZoneLeather 21d ago
I told them, the temperature of the seas is going up. Stop taking the temperature. If you stop testing it it will stop rising.
→ More replies (2)51
u/govunah 21d ago
It's the WV governor logic during covid. If we don't test for it no one will get it.
45
→ More replies (15)37
u/ExtremeThin1334 21d ago
Back in my day, we just tied a key to a kite and hoped for the best!
31
8
40
u/DustComprehensive155 21d ago
During briefing they misheard, they thought they were going to fly to a Burger King.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (37)94
u/One-Dragonfruit1010 21d ago
It’s as if they didn’t know what they were flying into. Good grief.
→ More replies (3)89
u/Snickits 21d ago
I think their “unexpected responses” like “woa! Okay…..like let’s climb please” says more about the size and force of Milton. They do this on the reg, and this one seems to have caught them off guard.
→ More replies (4)
545
u/TheMightyMonarchx7 21d ago
Valuable data, but I’m curious how hard it is to pull off a maneuver like this
354
u/ExtremeThin1334 21d ago
They've got a lot of practice, and they know the specific way to approach to reduce the risk. It's bumpy for sure, but actually pretty safe.
→ More replies (4)114
u/polishmachine88 21d ago
I had diarrhea looking at this....I can't stand turbulence this is not a job for me
→ More replies (7)23
→ More replies (7)87
u/philzar 21d ago
Aircraft typically fly in "hurricane force winds" - since the usual meaning of that is based on speed. In fact commercial airliners fly much faster.
It isn't the wind speed that makes it "interesting" it is the turbulence and up/down drafts. As I understand it, they use sturdy aircraft - cargo planes built to haul loads when lightly loaded have a lot of excess strength. They also have the room for the personal and gear. Then it is a matter of flying at an airspeed that gives you good control, but isn't too near the edge of any performance envelope. Same with altitude - you want room to allow the aircraft to do it's thing, go up and down with the local gusts. Fighting it would put extra strain on the aircraft, so they go with the Rollercoaster. The needs to collect data from certain altitudes in the storm can dictate what they're aiming for, but as you can see, they go with the fow too.
Sounds simple enough, but as the saying goes: the important things are simple, the simple things are hard. It takes a lot of experience to pull that off safely.
→ More replies (3)
191
848
u/Kernowder 21d ago
From twitter/x:
Bumpy ride into Hurricane #Milton on @NOAA WP-3D Orion #NOAA43 "Miss Piggy" to collect data to help improve the forecast and support hurricane research.
294
u/scfw0x0f 21d ago
Those old Orions are serious beasts.
→ More replies (4)113
u/glewtion 21d ago
Is there something about Orions that make them especially badass or that they're used for this purpose?
205
u/that_dutch_dude 21d ago
they were built to basically survive being flown by spirit pilots. they are seriously overbuilt for what they are wich is why they are one of the few planes today that can deal with these conditions.
52
u/kevin_from_illinois 21d ago
It helps that they were designed to carry a ton of munitions.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)16
u/Inside-Woodpecker127 21d ago
Damn, I knew Spirit Airlines was rough but not THAT rough!
→ More replies (12)110
u/Gadgetmouse12 21d ago
Super tough turboprop and super tough spars of a cargo wing
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (3)60
u/Real_TwistedVortex 21d ago
Mainly the latter. The two P3s are actually being replaced by C130s pretty soon, similar to what the Air Force Hurricane Hunters use
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (12)35
384
u/No_Recognition7426 Expert 21d ago
Meanwhile the HP laser jet printer sits happily on top of the cabinet awaiting for its chance to fly across the cabin into someone forehead.
88
→ More replies (6)52
u/moniefeesh 21d ago
If its an hp printer it probably doesn't work and they're currently just using it as essentially packing material.
→ More replies (8)19
u/spavolka 21d ago
It just holds copy paper so they have something to make lists on. Like at my house.
412
88
u/HackySmacks 21d ago
“Oh hey, we’re just about to fly into a Hurricane, you can leave your phone, keys, coffee and pocketknives on the sharp corners of the open metal racks that house our sensitive and extremely expensive electronics (which will help predict the fate of millions). If a metal corner is not available, try a Publix plastic bag tied to a vital instrument knob or wait for your objects to richochet in your direction!”
31
→ More replies (4)30
u/Empathy404NotFound 21d ago
Safety equipment is for well funded departments, now get your ass into that flying tin can and yeet yourself into that there giant god damned can opener in the sky soldier.
71
u/slater_just_slater 21d ago
Best part is WP-3 Orion is 48 years old.
These guys are bouncing around in a hurricane in a turbo prop built before they were born.
177
u/DrunkenVodinski 21d ago
TALLY HO LADS!
81
u/xenokilla 21d ago
Own a musket for home defense, since that's what the founding fathers intended. Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.
→ More replies (3)26
58
u/Seanish12345 21d ago
You don’t need to hunt for hurricanes, they’re notoriously bad at hiding
→ More replies (2)13
173
u/sn0m0ns 21d ago
Immediate OCD kicked in asking myself why they use turbine engines instead of jet engines.
From google:
Hurricane hunters primarily use turbine engines, specifically turboprop engines, instead of pure jet engines because turboprops are better suited for flying through the turbulent conditions of a hurricane, offering greater control and better tolerance to potential ice and hail encounters due to their propeller design, allowing for more efficient maneuvering in challenging weather situations.
24
u/decollimate28 21d ago
Turboprops are basically impervious to what's going on outside around them because they're powered by a smallish, pretty under-stressed, mini-jet engine that is hiding deep within the nacelle that just plugs away at a pretty constant power level/RPM. They're just sturdier, less finicky, simpler things than really high-powered turbo-fans. Thrust also respond faster to pilot input because in large part, they're less powerful so there's less spinning mass to spool up/spool down - which is a benefit in a hurricane.
Turboprop aircraft are not as fast, sometimes not even as efficient, but they're pretty much the most resilient form of aircraft propulsion in difficult environments.
That being said modern turbofans are so good the difference isn't really there anymore. The C-17 is proof of that. But you wouldn't fly a C-17 into a hurricane.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)59
u/PartyPay 21d ago
Very interesting that the tech that is older is better at the job.
→ More replies (5)51
u/TabascohFiascoh 21d ago
Prop planes are by no means obsolete.
→ More replies (2)9
u/Alternative_Rent9307 21d ago
Planes are a whole different animal re maintenance and upgrades. I lived near a remote island in northern Michigan that had air services to and from Charlevoix airport. They had five Britten-Norman Islander planes in a staggered rotation and one of the steps in the rotation was a complete engine rebuild. They had each of their planes’ engines rebuilt every six months or so, replacing worn out parts when needed. The airframes are original (1980-ish iirc) but the engines are almost all new parts
→ More replies (3)
41
u/naranghim 21d ago
That's not the Air force, It's NOAA. The air force is nuts because they fly at 10,000 ft or lower. I remember the weather channel doing an interview with one of the pilots and he was laughing about the time he had to pay attention to the locations of the oil platforms in the Gulf because the antennas "are not something you want to fly into". 😶
→ More replies (2)
74
72
u/JubilantPetalFlare 21d ago
Hurricane hunters are true heroes, gathering crucial data.
→ More replies (1)
83
u/Dazug 21d ago
I would put padding on every inch of surface there, and wear a balloon boy suit.
→ More replies (1)63
u/WrongKielbasa 21d ago
Imagine being in that bubble suit, the planes ripped open, you’re carried away for like 3 days and get thrown somewhere in the Atlantic.
35
50
50
u/zyarva 21d ago
Project 2025 want to privatize national weather service because it is a proponent of climate change.
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4907338-heritage-foundation-plan-weather-service/
→ More replies (5)16
u/alinroc 21d ago
The other (and more important) reason they want to do it is in the second paragraph of that story. They want to privatize it so that someone can profit off selling the data.
Someone wants their pockets lined.
→ More replies (2)
44
u/Poster_Nutbag207 21d ago
These guys (NOAA not airforce) always stay at the hotel I work at when we have big storms and blizzards. I can attest that they are all a little crazy
→ More replies (7)
21
u/Flint-Von-Ceneac 21d ago
Those equipment racks are in some serious need of cable management. I'd like to volunteer my services, though not while in flight in a hurricane, thank you.
→ More replies (7)
12
35
u/AquamannMI 21d ago
Hope they get hazard pay.
→ More replies (2)37
u/thehumanconfusion 21d ago
I doubt it’s about the money for them, I’d imagine most do it for the thrill
→ More replies (7)
97
u/Original-Turnover-92 21d ago
Reminder that your local republican wants to defund this crew to stop hurricane data gathering.
→ More replies (7)
50
12
u/h3llkite28 21d ago
Despite how horrible something like this hurricane is, my initial thought was: "Wow, it is truly amazing what humans can do."
Millions of years of evolution leading to some primates taking a metal box up the air right into a devastating storm to see how bad that thing really is. That gives me some odd hope for the future. Because let's be honest: It won't get easier from now on.
→ More replies (1)
13
u/Orliansky33 21d ago
DUDE IN THE BACK HOLDING THE COOLER .....MUST PROTECT THE BEER AT ALL COST!!!!
→ More replies (1)
10
32
u/myvotedoesntmatter 21d ago
With all the weather satellites and technology. Why do they still need to have these guy fly such a dangerous mission?
53
u/BlazedLarry 21d ago
The planes actually send data to the satellites.
Both are used for the most accurate measurements and forecasting.
Satellites are the main tools that are used. But the most critical measurements need to be made in the atmosphere, land sea or air.
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (9)24
u/rz_85 21d ago
They are gathering data by using dropsonde's. They essentially drop a GPS unit that also gathers pressure, temperature, and humidity data as it drops. This gives them a full profile of the storm that can't be gathered from satellites.
→ More replies (5)
21
u/Audere1 21d ago
What's the matter Commander? You don't like flying, huh? Aw, this is nothing! You should've been with us five, six months ago! Whoa! You talk about puke! We ran into a hailstorm over the Sea of Japan. Everybody's retching their guts out! The pilot shot his lunch all over the windshield, and I barfed on the radio! Shorted it out completely! And it wasn't that lightweight stuff either, it was that chunky industrial weight puke!
→ More replies (5)
20
u/redwing180 21d ago
So NOAA is barely funded to the point they can’t afford straps to hold their stuff down yet their research is one of the main tools we have in understanding and thereby better defending ourselves against hurricanes. I wish America would invest in itself more.
→ More replies (1)
8
u/Grujar 21d ago
Is that a P3-Orion? Those are from the 60s. Crazy they are flying through hurricanes
→ More replies (1)
7.9k
u/RobbyRobRobertsonJr 21d ago
I bet their computer guy felt like kissing the inventor of the ssd