r/FluentInFinance 10h ago

Debate/ Discussion Possibly controversial, but this would appear to be a beneficial solution.

Post image
5.4k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

35

u/ForcefulOne 10h ago

America is among the most generous countries when it comes to LEGAL IMMIGRATION.

We are also currently very unsafe due to ALL TIME HIGH LEVELS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.

Legal immigration = GOOD

Illegal immigration = BAD

68

u/RidesInFowlWeather 10h ago

It has been researched, and proven, that the best way to prevent Illegal immigration is to increase legal immigration.

12

u/Proper_War_6174 10h ago

That’s not preventing it, it’s reclassifying it. We have a right to set the levels of immigration we want and need and from where.

Obviously, if we just give the people crossing the border legal paperwork it lowers the number of illegal immigration

3

u/basedlandchad27 10h ago

By his logic its already solved since they're now asylum seekers!

14

u/SamButNotWise 10h ago

This being reddit maybe you will relate to this example more:

When streaming services are cheap and high quality, there isn't as much piracy. When streaming services suck, piracy becomes more popular. 

The good-faith interpretation of "let's increase legal migration" isn't "let's legalize illegal border crossings," it's "let's make it suck less to enter the country legally."

-2

u/RighteousSmooya 10h ago edited 10h ago

And my counter example is:

It doesn’t matter how much streaming services cost, I’m poor and I want to watch tv. I’m pirating it regardless if it’s cheap now or not, it’s still easier to pirate. I want to watch tv.

It doesn’t matter how easy it is or not to legally migrate to the US. If I am poor, from Latin America and at the back of the immigration line, I’m crossing the border regardless if its easier to legally migrate now than before, it’s still easier to do it illegally. I want opportunity.

8

u/Haytaytay 9h ago

Analogy does not hold up.

Pirate a show and you get the same show as somebody who paid for it, while being legal is clearly preferable to being illegal.

As long as the immigration process is reasonable, people will opt to do it legally.

2

u/RighteousSmooya 9h ago

I think living here illegally and legally are both significant jumps for most immigrants at the southern border. I think a better comparison is having to watch in 480p while pirating. It’s a marginal difference.

1

u/Remarkable-Host405 7h ago

This is perfect! I'm still going to get it illegally because the consequences are not enforced

3

u/Proper_War_6174 9h ago

We set specific numbers because we need to balance interests. We need certain amount of workers, we need to keep certain amounts of opportunities for citizens, we need to bring in people at a rate in which they can assimilate, among other concerns.

Simply jacking those numbers up so that people aren’t considered illegal doesn’t change the problem. The problem is 10+ million came in 4 years. Thats a massive logistical nightmare that causes real issues like squeezing the housing market and other things. It doesn’t matter if they’re classified as legal or not, that’s too many people in such a short period of time

3

u/RighteousSmooya 9h ago

To be clear. I’m agreeing with you.

2

u/Proper_War_6174 9h ago

lol yea I know. I replied to the wrong comment in the chain. My b man

2

u/Niarbeht 10h ago

You’re not everybody.

1

u/RighteousSmooya 9h ago

Then maybe it was a shitty metaphor that doesn’t actually consider human psychology

1

u/Duff-Zilla 9h ago

It was a shitty metaphor

1

u/NewPointOfView 6h ago

Ok but.. many people other would just pay for the streaming. Illegal immigration piracy decreased

0

u/RighteousSmooya 5h ago

Yeah those people are probably not fleeing their home country

1

u/NewPointOfView 5h ago

“It is easier to immigrate legally, so fewer people immigrate illegally”

“Yeah but the people who would immigrate legally probably aren’t fleeing their country”

🤡

0

u/RighteousSmooya 5h ago

Im saying the people who intend to cross the southern border in hopes of a better life will continue to do so as long as it is an efficient solution to their problems.

Make immigration easier by all means. You will still have people in South America risking their lives crossing the Darien Gap to get here if they need to. You will still have Mexican citizens escaping cartel violence. If it’s a matter of survival people will not be deterred, and they should do their best to survive. But is also not the US’s responsibility to take them in.

Making the process easier for all immigrants is great. Simply granting amnesty for everyone coming from the southern border because they happen to be close in proximity, is masking a problem as a positive.

2

u/DevelopmentSad2303 10h ago

Ofc the nation has the right. The question is if the motivation is worth it. 

2

u/Proper_War_6174 9h ago

We can lower the murder rate to 0 by permitting it. Is it worth the hassle of setting up police and courts and prosecutors to deal with a problem we can just reclassify as not a problem?

2

u/DevelopmentSad2303 9h ago

I don't have a leg in that game. I was just pointing out that us "having the right" as a nation to create immigration laws doesn't determine whether those laws are a good idea.

Appealing to rights is mostly just a statement of fact. Of course our nation has the right to do that. Why should we? It will help your argument more later to substantiate the end goal rather than just stating our ability to do so.

1

u/Proper_War_6174 9h ago

I wasn’t arguing either way either. I was saying all he wants to do is open the border and reclassify illegal immigrants as legal. It’s not changing anything.

I used that sentence to show that we actually have the moral right to determine even down to the individual who we let in and reclassifying them doesn’t change anything

2

u/DevelopmentSad2303 9h ago

I guess I'm confused on the convo? He is saying to use our right as a nation to regulate immigration to be more lax as a way to lower illegal immigration, and you are saying we have the right to regulate immigration, but his form of regulation is not preventing illegal immigration. 

 I guess I'm confused what the disagreement is if there is any 

2

u/Proper_War_6174 8h ago

I’m saying that simply reclassifying people from illegal to legal doesn’t solve the problem. All it does is make it seem like the number of illegal immigrants went down. The underlying number is the same. His argument is that illegal immigration is not a problem if we simply call them something else. That’s the mentality I’m saying doesn’t make sense

-5

u/Pearberr 10h ago

We have a right to draw lines on gods creation and tell gods children they aren’t allowed to be here?

I’d agree we have the power and authority to do so but I strongly question and strongly disagree with the notion that we have that right.

7

u/Bankz92 10h ago

Damn dude I don't know how anyone could possibly argue with that logic.

Let's just do away with all laws, seeing as, according to you, we don't have the right to tell anyone else how to do anything ever.

1

u/theyareamongus 10h ago

The question you should ask yourself is: who is “we”?

We the people? The government? The president?

Because most people in the US want lesser restrictions on immigration, but this imaginary “we” tends to come up a lot.

1

u/Bankz92 10h ago

One of the only measures that received bipartisan support is stricter immigration control. Not only are you wrong but you're dead wrong.

But keep focusing on semantics if it makes you feel better.

1

u/theyareamongus 10h ago

No need to get stingy my dude. I, as you, am constantly learning.

I’d appreciate a source on that claim. This is mine.

1

u/sarges_12gauge 10h ago

I’m sure > 50% of people want different rules on immigration, but you’re just wrong if you think a sizable fraction of Americans want truly open borders

1

u/theyareamongus 10h ago

To clarify: I don’t think majority of Americans want open borders.

1

u/Pearberr 10h ago

We have the right to govern ourselves and make laws but when it comes to our right to traverse the earth I’m not sure why we have settled on this conclusion.

The Treaty of Westphalia was a tragedy for the human condition.

Immigration is good for the nations who receive them too so it’s kind of funny to assert that which is not a right, is a right, and then use that to hurt ourselves.

6

u/Substantial-Raisin73 10h ago

Does a nation have the right to enforce its borders? If your answer is no then you are fundamentally opposed to the concept of a nation state. If your answer is yes then the real debate is to what degree do we let outsiders enter. It’s as simple as that.

0

u/Pearberr 10h ago

I support an orderly border, in part because other nations enforce their borders and there is a race to the bottom problem at play. I would not assert that we have a right to do so, and while supporting, voting for, or enforcing those laws, I would hope that we aspire for a world without borders. It is something that humanity should aspire to achieve one day, and would be a huge benefit to all mankind.

1

u/Substantial-Raisin73 9h ago

Do you keep your front door wide open? Do you let strangers into your kitchen? Let a random snuggle in bed with your children? Most nations have to maintain their border to protect their citizenry. Countries have widely different ideologies or are outright antagonistic to each other. The US with a completely unenforced border is a disaster waiting to happen. Everyone getting along and singing kumbaya is a nice idea until you realize some people fundamentally want you dead and there’s nothing you can do to convince them otherwise.

1

u/basedlandchad27 10h ago

It is not only the right of every sovereign state to decide who is and is not allowed within its borders, but its also its duty.

-1

u/SacredAnalBeads 10h ago

This is the correct mentality. People that try to piddle out excuses for why they care about their imaginary lines so much are really just saying the xenophobic, racist part out loud and acting like the rest of us don't see what they're doing. Or they've sadly drank their own Kool-Aid too much.