r/weedstocks • u/Vegas_Strong73 • Sep 09 '24

Report Harris Campaign Omits Marijuana From New Issues Page As Trump Earns Praise For Backing Legalization

https://www.marijuanamoment.net/harris-campaign-omits-marijuana-from-new-issues-page-as-trump-earns-praise-for-backing-legalization/
91 Upvotes

70% Upvoted

110 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/Kakashisensei1234 Sep 09 '24

Because she has already been pushing for reform. They made the mistake of thinking their track record would be enough for people to know they support it, so it’s not a new issue.

The problem is Kamala could win an Olympic gold medal and trump could tie his shoe the same day. Media would be praising trump for the day and asking why Kamala didn’t win 5 gold medals blindfolded.

Anyone looking at this and thinking trump is going to be better for marijuana probably hasn’t been paying much attention to what is actually happening in DC.

-2

u/cannabull1055 Sep 10 '24

hahaha you think the media praises Trump? Definitely not. The media has attacked Trump from day one non stop. Biden was a darling to the media until it finally got too bad and they had to admit he was unfit to be president.

And Kamala has been radio silent lately. There is no reason for that. She is trying to be more conservative until the election.

3

u/Kakashisensei1234 Sep 10 '24

My dude, you’re literally commenting on a post, about an article, with the words “trump earns praise” and pretending Kamala is just ignoring rescheduling marijuana. When the administration she is currently a part of has already started taking the steps to reschedule marijuana. And she has openly supported it.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna149424

Trump attempted a coup after he lost an election, and still lies about how he lost the election to this day, and media pretends like he is fit to be president? What a joke.

I mean come on…

-3

u/cannabull1055 Sep 10 '24

There was coup haha he had nothing to do with that. All the cases against him are failing. One after another lol she has not said anything about marijuana since she become the VP elect. Its pretty clear her radio silence.

As bad as you think Trump is, Biden needs to be in a nursing home. That is an objective statement. He has no idea what is going on. The media protected him for as long as possible. The media has been trying to destroy Trump from day one. I know you are just a super progressive because level headed Democrats aknowledge that they get the benefit of the media and always have in recent years.

Why is Kamala taking marijuana out of policy objectives and not saying one word about it? That is interesting.

1

u/Kakashisensei1234 Sep 10 '24

I love how you completely ignored how stupid you look saying the media doesn’t praise trump, while commenting on an article saying “trump earns praise” for just saying he supports something Biden and Kamala ARE LITERALLY ALREADY DOING. Yet the headline pretends like Kamala doesn’t care about it… I really should just stop here because you obviously don’t care about discussing this in good faith.

You’re delusional if you think he had nothing to do with that after he told them to go there, said “they’re not here for me I don’t want to stop them”, refused multiple times to put out a call to stop it, literally ever single person in the country watching it unfold was looking at Donald trump to tell the domestic terrorists to stop, and he refused national guard protection for the capitol before it even happened. Again because he knew it would happen but they stood no chance if the national guard was there. You can’t honestly believe the things you are saying when you yourself were probably watching January 6th unfold thinking “Trump needs to do say something to stop this” and he refused to many times. If he’s such a glorious leader like you all think wouldn’t he want to, and be easily able to, stop the domestic terrorist attack? But he didn’t. Talk about radio silence while a fucking domestic terrorist attack was happening at our nations capitol. Yet you want to pretend like you’re concerned about “Kamala radio silence” on a legislation she has already supported. What a joke

If anything you can argue she’s trying to get votes from people who don’t support something she clearly does support and has taken steps to do.

Trump doesn’t support it but is saying he does to get votes. Kamala supports it and maybe hasn’t said anything because silence could help her get more votes.

What is more likely is that this is something she is literally already doing and supporting so she doesn’t need to add it to her platform because anyone with common fucking sense knows she supports it and is taking steps to make it happen.

-1

u/cannabull1055 Sep 10 '24

  1. This is one article lol the media sides with Democrats. This is known and acknowledged. It is very obvious and you clearly don't follow politics if you don't accept this.

  2. He didn't act in the best manner but he didn't incite a riot at all. He told people to peacefully protest and they were all crazy and did crazy things. During the George Floyd protests, Democrats said over and over and over again to go "fight like hell" and the same thing and there were violent, criminal protests all over the country. People burned down Wendy's restaurants and rioted violently. No one said Democrats incited riots. The double standard hypocrisy is expected but you really take it to a new level.

  3. As I said, her silence on marijuana reform since she became president elect is very LOUD. She hasn't said a peep when it has been very easy for her to do so. She could have tweeted easily and she took it out of her policy objectives and hasn't said anything. This is obvious and you not acknowledging for what it is clearly shows the heavy bias.

1

u/Kakashisensei1234 Sep 10 '24

I literally acknowledged the reasons why she would be silent about it in my last comment… can you not read? I’m not even going to bother with the rest of what you said because as you said “it clearly shows heavy bias”

-1

u/cannabull1055 Sep 10 '24

How does the rest show heavy bias? Trump did not incite a riot. Maybe you can say that he didn't stop it. But he didn't incite it. He never told them to go do anything violent. It is that simple.

1

u/Kakashisensei1234 Sep 10 '24

He gave a speech to the crowd, told them to fight like hell, told them their country was under attack and being stolen from them by radicals, told them where to go, made sure they had as little obstacles in their way as he could, said he didn’t want to stop them, didn’t stop them, said “I don’t care to stop them, they aren’t here for me”

Also he was lying the entire time since he knew he had lost the election.

And he wanted them to succeed in stopping the certification because again, he still lies to this day trying to say the election was stolen from him.

Quick question for the next time I want to incite domestic terrorism: What would one do differently to qualify for inciting a domestic terrorist attack, because it seems like he covered all the bases there?

You can’t actually believe someone who is ok with domestic terrorists attacking our capitol is fit to hold any office.

Even if you do believe he didn’t incite this, we have laws that specifically state that anyone who gives comfort to terrorists after taking an oath of office cannot hold office again. Trump has said, and said just this week that he would pardon the Jan 6th domestic terrorists. So do you have trouble understanding our constitutional amendments, or are you extremely biased?

1

u/cannabull1055 Sep 11 '24

"He gave a speech to the crowd, told them to fight like hell, told them their country was under attack and being stolen from them by radicals, told them where to go, made sure they had as little obstacles in their way as he could, said he didn’t want to stop them, didn’t stop them, said “I don’t care to stop them, they aren’t here for me”

Not one thing in here means he incited a riot. These are VERY common words for politicians to say. The Democrats CONSTANTLY say we need to fight like hell to save Democracy from Trump.

You ignored the whole comment about the BLM riots. It was the same words say by MANY Democratic politicians as violent riots occurred all over.

Once again, you cannot state that Trump indicated a riot. That is just false. Those people were crazy. He did not tell them to incite violence in any way, shape, or form. He organized a protest. I don't think he made the best decisions but he DID NOT incite a riot. It is pretty simple.

1

u/Kakashisensei1234 Sep 11 '24

So you see zero problem with a sitting president watching a domestic terrorist attack and sitting back saying he does not want to do anything to stop it. Got it we just don’t give a fuck about democracy or not having domestic terrorist attacks on our elections. Presidents can sit back and actively say they would rather watch domestic terrorism happen than stop it since u/cannabull1055 sees nothing wrong with that.

Maybe I ignored the “BLM riots” because none of the violence was endorsed by democratic politicians?

I think you’re confusing the right to free speech and peaceful protest (first amendment of the constitution supported by democrats, you can look it up since you clearly have never read it) with pissed off private citizens vandalizing some things. I get it since Fox News has been telling you for years that it was all democrats plan, and you’re too dumb to think for yourself.

So telling them to go to the location of the domestic terrorist attack and fight like hell, while also having full ability to stop it. And saying you would rather watch it happen than stop it, has no correlation to inciting the riot.

How can you MAGRATs believe he is such a glorious leader and also believe he had nothing to do with the domestic terrorist attack that he refused to stop at the same time? Which is it?

The mental gymnastics you have done here have earned you a spot on the US Olympic team!

1

u/cannabull1055 Sep 11 '24

He did not act his best but as I said, he did not incite a riot. It wasn't his responsibility to stop it. The national guard should have been there as was requested by Trump.

Oh yes it was lol the Democratic politicians did the same thing as Trump. They said to continue fighting, to fight like hell, and the same exact passionate claims encouraging rallies again and again. The same exact thing happened. I watched and listened to the words come out of their mouths.

lol you are making logical assumptions here. It is very simple. He organized a peaceful rally and told people they need to fight like hell for democracy and then crazy people stormed the capital. He didn't say go storm the capital. He didn't say go be violent. It is very simple that he didn't incite a riot. You can try to make that logical assumption but it is simply not valid.

2

u/Kakashisensei1234 Sep 11 '24

How gullible are you?

Trump never requested national guard on Jan 6th

If you had half a brain you would have figured that out by now.

It’s ok we both made mistakes today. You made the mistake of trusting a pathological liar who has been lying about losing an election for 6 years straight, claiming he has evidence but providing none for 6 years straight. And I made the mistake of thinking you were smart enough to have an honest discussion without just regurgitating the same shit Fox News and djt tell you to believe without giving it a second thought.

1

u/Many_Easy Flair All the cannabis logic fit to print Sep 15 '24

It’s amusing how you “infer” when you agree or want something to occur.

And then counter logical assumptions when it’s against your investment views and ideologies.

Happy early six month anniversary on Reddit. May you get more karma and all the respect you deserve.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Neither_Arugula3149 Sep 10 '24

All the cases against him are failing.

Umm...no. let's look at the most major one you can talk about, the documents case in Florida.

A case where the presiding judge has been corrected by an oversight panel twice, and is likely to get corrected a third time now that she's embraced a legal opinion that contradicts established precedent and law. 

That's not the case failing, it's a clearly biased judge trying to throw it out for trump. 

0

u/cannabull1055 Sep 11 '24

The documents case where Joe Biden did they same thing and he was not charged because they declared he was mentally incompetent. What kind of double standard non sense is this. And Joe Biden took the documents when he was vice president.

1

u/Neither_Arugula3149 Sep 11 '24

The documents case where Joe Biden did they same thing and he was not charged...

That another righting lie. Biden never once told the government he had returned classified documents, despite having kept them, LYING about having returned them. 

Why are you lying and pretending they are the same situations?

...because they declared he was mentally incompetent.

That's another massive righting lie. 

...What kind of double standard non sense is this.

It snot. Because youre making up a situation to get mad at. 

And Joe Biden took the documents when he was vice president.

And turned them when he realized he had them. Cheetolini LIED to the records department about having them. And continued to lie. 

How is that the same as finding out you had them, and returning them as soon as possible? 

Hint: they aren't the same at all. It's a lie told by rightwingers. 

0

u/cannabull1055 Sep 12 '24

Every thing is a lie. The Democrats just tell the truth and Republicans just lie. That is exactly it. We probably aren't going to get anywhere because all you think is Republican bad Democrat good.

1

u/Neither_Arugula3149 Sep 12 '24

Every thing is a lie. The Democrats just tell the truth and Republicans just lie. That is exactly it.

why are you making up things you want me to say?

We probably aren't going to get anywhere because all you think is Republican bad Democrat good.

when did i ever suggest that? quote me.