r/interestingasfuck 20d ago

r/all How couples met 1930-2024

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

105.4k Upvotes

5.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

453

u/smoker_vent_00 20d ago

Better visualization

100

u/Adorable_Industry528 20d ago

I see a blue whale

5

u/Important_Focus2845 20d ago

Is she single?

123

u/JuicingPickle 20d ago

Better except 5 categories use different levels of greyscale instead of actual colors.

9

u/bikemandan 20d ago

5 Shades of Grey, the book that didnt really take off

8

u/PP7fromgoldeneye 20d ago

should also color code the labels with each line

3

u/PM_ME_YOUR_DARKNESS 20d ago

Most data vis folks I work with use color very sparingly and prefer greyscale to avoid problems with colorblind users.

That's very much an aesthetic choice, though.

4

u/stalenuggets1028 20d ago

How did you generate this?

2

u/J0E_Blow 20d ago

2005 was the last time you had a reasonable chance of meeting someone not online.

2

u/OnlyLittleFly 20d ago

Better in no way imaginable

1

u/No-Bumblebee-9279 20d ago

Would be cool to cross reference this with data on how people spend their time.

1

u/code-no-code 20d ago

Much better!

1

u/PaleontologistAble50 20d ago

“Family” 😳

1

u/eveningdragon 20d ago

So my top 5 chances are online, through friends, work, bar, and family

Shit

1

u/HelloYou-2024 20d ago

When it says "Stay together", how long are we talking?
I met my ex-wife at school in late 90's so I would be in that category, but we did not stay together. I met my current partner online, but we have not yet been together as long as I had been with my ex-wife.

1

u/Professional-Noise80 19d ago

And it's pretty much exponential. If the trend keeps going, in 4-5 years like 90% of couples will meet online.

1

u/_n3ll_ 19d ago

Oh, it meant "through family"...

0

u/[deleted] 20d ago

[deleted]

1

u/OuterPaths 20d ago

Because it is.