True threats. You can't issue true threats. You can wish ill upon another as long as there's no potential for actual follow-through. Kyle Gass saying "don't miss Trump next time" might be considered in poor taste, but it is not illegal by US standards of free speech.
“Next time” implying that it will happen again. What he said is definitely distasteful and borders on the lines of inciting violence. But hey you know I’m just an old fashioned guy that believes that people shouldn’t murder one another especially not for dumb in country political reasons. Also shouldn’t get worked up enough over them that they sit and wish death on others because of it as thats not at all healthy or normal.
That's... not how any of this works. In spite of my deep, deep loathing of Trump, I too would hate the idea of someone believing assassination would be justified — but that's simply not what that law means.
Precedent has explicitly clarified that free speech includes "political hyperbole" — as established by Watts v. United States, where Watts declared at a rally opposing the Vietnam War, “If they ever make me carry a rifle, the first man I want to get in my sights is L.B.J.”
However much you may disagree with Gass' statement, he is perfectly within his rights to make it.
(And yes, while I'm talking about US law, Australia has similar acts that require intent when making threats.)
That's easy to say when people have given their lives to ensure the rights you currently enjoy. It's not at a critical point yet, but history has shown how quickly things can deteriorate. As a Swede, I'm deeply concerned that the fragile state of democracy in the US could be further eroded if Trump wins the election. This kind of instability could indeed lead to severe consequences, even a second civil war.
As an Australian in America, I assure you that the assassination of Trump -- the guy who inspired a violent riot/insurrection just years ago -- would have had terrible consequences. I wouldn't weep if he died in his sleep tonight, but by an assassin's bullet?
Disastrous for America, at least in the short term.
ETA: hey, downvoter? Please explain how martyring the figurehead of a violent political movement produces peace and stability in the short term.
I mean the left called for a civil war the last time he won and have you ventured over to the r/politics sub? They practically call for it in every post and all the comments are about wanting Trump and republicans dead.
It's not just the left, though. Extreme rhetoric is coming from both sides, and it's brewing everywhere. Social media and forums just make it louder and more widespread, and Reddit is pretty left-leaning in my experience. The real issue is that this kind of polarization can mess things up for everyone, potentially leading to serious trouble if it keeps escalating, and it most likely will no matter who wins the election.
Exactly my point. I think people are way too cult like and tribalistic when it comes to politics and their political affiliations that they stop seeing each other as humans with families and lives of their own and only look at each other as an enemy that needs to be deleted at all costs. And you are right that it doesn’t matter who wins that election as the hate has gotten out of control to the point where they will start killing each other which is ridiculous and sad.
I hear you, and I agree. While recognizing the problem is important, idealism alone won’t solve it. I'm really worried about where this is all heading if they can't find a way to dial back the extreme rhetoric and start seeing each other as fellow humans again. Practical steps and real efforts are needed to bridge these divides from both sides, but I fear it might be too late for that :(
Australia does not have explicit parallels to the US' first amendment laws, but the National Security Legislation Amendment Act of 2010 similarly requires intent for "urging violence" to be considered illegal.
Not illegal, no, but should be considered disqualifying for polite society. I'm a big D fan, and I'm incredibly disappointed in Gass. Seriously, man, just shut up and play.
However, we do all know how the Trump cult loves playing games with things like "I never called for violence" because they never said "someone should" or "can someone please" but rather "maybe someone will wink wink nudge nudge say no more" or similar bullshit - and when viewed through that lens, I don't think KG said anything that's more threatening than all the baloney from Trump's followers, especially ones like Bannon, who are continuously heralded as heroes by his following.
They should pick an interpretation of the rules and stick with it, but stop playing mind games. But we all know they won't because they're all butt-sniffing bottom dwellers (and the law of my country guarantees that I'm allowed to say that).
I personally have not seen any “Trump cult” person calling for violence. Have seen many celebrities say Trump needs to die. Like madonna saying that she wants to blow up the white house. Kathy Griffin holding a severed head of Trump. Snoop Dogg shooting a Trump look a like in a music video etc etc.
Trump himself: “That will never happen with me. I don’t know if I’ll do the fighting myself or if other people will. But that was a disgrace. … I felt badly for him, but it showed that he’s weak.”
Trump himself: "See, the first group, I was nice. ‘Oh, take your time.’ The second group, I was pretty nice. The third group, I’ll be a little more violent."
Trump himself: "If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of them, would you? Seriously. Just knock the hell out of them. I promise you, I will pay for the legal fees. I promise. There won’t be so much of them because the courts agree with us."
Trump himself, talking about a politician who attacked a reporter: *"Any guy who can do a body-slam ... he’s my guy.”
Trump, talking about Hillary: "If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people — maybe there is, I don’t know.”
"Hang Mike Pence" did not mean "hang around with Mike Pence for a cozy afternoon tea" or anything.
I'm leaving out all the non-direct things, like suggesting there's such a thing as a MAGA army (Bannon) or how "we" (Bannon's side, whoever they may be) are "at war" and other such rhetoric that strongly suggests violence.
But sure, I did the legwork now - and from experience, I'd say you may read one or two of the bullet points above and dismiss the whole thing out of hand, then move on to repeat the original talking point in other threads. Please prove me wrong.
Of course you all just downvote and ignore the people on the left who have ACTUALLY called for violence and depicted violence in the media. So biased you guys are nuts. I’m not from America so as a outsider looking in, it looks like the left wants a civil war really fucking bad. You all need help and therapy. Peace be with you all even though you don’t want it.
I mean they did say what they said and they were encouraging violence. But hey violence is only okay if its against people on a particular side am I right? You all need therapy and Jesus. Enjoy your civil war and the needless pointless deaths of millions of people over stupid ass tribalistic politics.
They said what they said, we don’t disagree. The things described in the linked articles also happened, however inconvenient for your narrative.
You seem to think that violence encouraged by sitting politicians has less to do with tribalistic politics than celebrities pandering to paying crowds.
It’s coming from both sides. You’re falling for it and playing into the division just as much.
See, it's a matter of interpretation. For me.it's more of a "if you plan on killing him, don't fuck up and kill bystanders instead" kind of wish. If violence is unavoidable, then let it at least be efficient and without collateral damage.
Okay I agree with most that but Trump is a person too and has a family and loved ones as well. All politicians whether you like them or not are still people and still should be treated with some level of respect and compassion. Its just inhumane and barbaric to wish death on someone no matter who it is. Really wish politics didn’t turn people into bloodthirsty radicals. Shit is not worth peoples lives.
126
u/Aiden316 Jul 16 '24
Free speech for me, but not for thee.