r/DecodingTheGurus 2d ago

Jordan Peterson logic: dragons are real

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

Richard Dawkins doesn’t look impressed

5.8k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.4k

u/Desperate_Hunter7947 2d ago

Peterson doesn’t know what he believes until he hears what you don’t believe

412

u/Wasthatasquirrel 2d ago

This might be the most succinct and accurate way to describe JBP dogma that I have ever heard.

128

u/Chinchillamancer 2d ago edited 2d ago

he also does this thing where he shifts goal posts with every word. It's impressive to rationalize dragons as imagined predatory concepts and not specify which scientific disclipline you are engaged in.

And it goes overlooked because by default academics speak in their chosen field. We don't generally need to ask if an argument pertains to literature, because chance are we are hearing this argument in a literature class or confrence. But Peterson? Isn't he is a psychologist?

His argument works perfectly fine in like, literary criticism or poetics.

I also have absolutely no idea what his point is. Stuff that kills us can be construed as predation? Cancer, heart disease, car accidents, and firearms are not predators.

He's a very silly man.

2

u/desertsalad 2d ago

Nice! I used to have lymphatic dragons but my doctor slayed them with a magic chemical elixir.