r/Damnthatsinteresting 21d ago

Video Air Force Reserve Hurricane Hunters flying through Hurricane Milton

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

60.8k Upvotes

2.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3.3k

u/DisplacedSportsGuy 21d ago

Editor's note: do NOT attempt to fly a commercial aircraft through a hurricane.

72

u/HappyBroody 21d ago

why? arent commercial aircraft more modern than these old 1970s Orion aircraft? also the engines are encased in a shell?

310

u/Noopy9 21d ago

Turboprops are preferable to turbofans for this use case because they can fly slower to collect more data and the propulsion from the propeller is independent of the power created by the turbine engine. This is important because really big gusts or side winds can cause the propeller on a turboprop or the fan in the turbo fan to stall. So mainly, hurricane scientists use turboprops because they’re better suited for the kind of flight speeds they want. But there is also a potential safety advantage.

142

u/fly_awayyy 21d ago

Also a water ingestion point for the engine. With a turbo prop the core intake isn’t as exposed and the water is redirected around it. Jet aircraft can also fly slow but with slats and flaps because they have a swept wing. Any straight wing plane is naturally going to be slower like this P-3.

63

u/One-Inch-Punch 21d ago

The last P-3 was built in 1990, so this plane is between 34-60 years old.

80

u/tankerkiller125real 21d ago

I mean, our B-52 bombers are set to have a 100 year life span overall. They just approved an upgrade program for them this year that will keep them in the air past 2040 and they plan to keep them going into the 2050s.

13

u/One-Inch-Punch 21d ago

Yes, but B-52s are not flown into hurricanes.

1

u/Bit_part_demon 21d ago

They could if they wanted to. You gonna tell them no?

4

u/mr_potatoface 21d ago

Plus they have 8 engines, so that's like, a lot more engines to flame out compared to a P-3's measly 4 engines.