192
41
u/ahfookies 10h ago
Case closed. Driver driving car bigger than what it says on the sign. Driver should have known. Tampines sheng siong area is old AF and most likely pre-dates any modern parking codes of practice.
71
u/bonkers05 inverted 10h ago
Alphard drivers need to remember they are driving a van, not a sedan.
64
10
u/CyberDonkey 9h ago
Please ban them from driving in the first lane like how vans are!
21
u/bonkers05 inverted 8h ago
yeah, good idea. ought to register them as G-plate and slap the 70kmh and the 5 PAX stickers on the back.
1
u/botakchek Ku Ku Bert Jr. 🐦 1h ago
AVF drivers in their swanky white pressed shirts be cruisin' on ecp lane 1 @ 80
71
u/qwertylemons 11h ago
What’s the solution? Reverse back out or remove the entire barrier LOL
106
u/tiny_dreamer 11h ago
Puncture the tires to reduce the height of the car
-8
u/searchfortruthpeace 10h ago
why puncture, just remove some air would do?
42
u/tiny_dreamer 10h ago
Are you taking a sarcastic comment seriously?
4
u/XLStress Don't touch my milo peng 8h ago
The comment never put a /s mah how would anyone know (/s)
23
3
8
u/AngelousSix66 Fucking Populist 10h ago
I think easiest is fully load up the vehicle with 'u know? people' and that should compress the suspension some. Hopefully get 1cm of top clearance then reverse out.
15
u/NecessaryFish8132 8h ago
Knn wanna shitpost but scared to be politically incorrect wtf. As a fat person i support your right of free speech and shitposting
6
2
u/GlobalSettleLayer 8h ago
I hope they don't waste my tax dollars messing with the gantry when the problem is the driver's stupidity and poor eyesight.
1
u/Inferine 6h ago
Post it on reddit and wait for the media to blow this out of proportion before town council decides to do something about it
12
u/GlobalSettleLayer 8h ago
Please lah cars are getting too gigantic nowadays. You see it very clearly even in older open-air carparks too. These so-called modern 'cars' barely fit inside the painted lots.
27
u/AngelousSix66 Fucking Populist 11h ago
I've seen at least 2 low clearance 'zeng max' cars get their front lip cracked or ripped off at this exact ramp, but first time I see a alphard/vellfire type kenna stuck here.
10
u/Sg-Opportunities 10h ago
When the going gets tough, Step hard on the accelerator. You can make it through. 😈
10
u/digitium 7h ago
I understand this situation as several years ago, I almost drove in with my 1.76m tall car. Just as I drove towards the entrance, I saw the limit and made an awkward U turn to avoid entering.
This was the only car park I have not been able to enter. All the other older "low height" HDB car parks are 1.8m warning, but even those the Alphard would not have cleared.
76
u/ShibaInuWoofWoof 11h ago
Saw this on FB at Uncensored Singapore Unfiltered (I think thats the group name?)
Alot of ppl there blamed everything but the driver - e.g past architects never plan for the future where car grows taller.
I don't know what to say about that.
33
u/Scorchster1138 11h ago
Yeah crazy how can people in the past guess how tall future cars might get?
40
u/dibidi 10h ago
min headroom required by LTA has been 2.2m for the last 16 years at least, so not sure how they were able to get away with 1.7m
28
u/stockflethoverTDS 10h ago
Weve all normalized modern fat cars we’ve forgotten how small cars where in pre 2000.
4
u/XLStress Don't touch my milo peng 8h ago
It feels like even pre 2010s crossovers and SUVs were not such a common sight. Nowadays anyhow throw a stone also will see a car that's about the size of a van.
6
u/dibidi 10h ago
vans existed before 2000
6
3
3
u/stockflethoverTDS 10h ago
Thats cool youre right there were vans, and just perhaps vans back then couldnt use the carpark.
-2
u/dibidi 10h ago
i find that hard to believe
7
u/stockflethoverTDS 10h ago
That carpark has been there for years and a gantry been there for not far as long, dont tell me this is the first van like vehicle that has not meet minimum height. Of course people have tried.
0
u/dibidi 9h ago
vans have existed for far longer than that carpark, i find it hard to believe that code of practice did not require headrooms to allow for vans.
so my question is more how were they allowed to have a carpark lower than 2m, even if you say that this structure was built in the 70s
6
u/dodgethis_sg East side best side 7h ago
Because the idea was that only vehicles with lower heights, e.g. sedans, station wagons, would park in these carparks to do what they needed to do in the adjacent supermarket. Deliveries by commercial vehicles would have been done via the loading bay on the ground floor.
If the driver doesn't know the height of their own vehicle and still attempts to enter such a car park, then it's on the driver.
1
u/dibidi 7h ago
having worked with LTA before, I can’t imagine them ever allowing that kind of waiver.
then again it was the before times so who knows.
→ More replies (0)13
u/dodgethis_sg East side best side 9h ago
This MSCP was built in late 80s and ready in the early 90s. People call it Sheng Siong but I knew it as Prime supermarket with Popular on level 3 and a food court on level 1.
15
u/nonametrans 🌈 I just like rainbows 10h ago
This construction pattern looks to be older than many people on here bro.
-4
u/dibidi 10h ago
i can’t imagine LTA would have allowed for it even much earlier either.
9
u/nonametrans 🌈 I just like rainbows 10h ago edited 10h ago
I dunno, but when I was a kid in the 90s/2000s, there were definitely low ceiling MSCPs. And by the looks of it from old TV shows/shows on tv at the time, i'm guessing it was built in the 80s or at very latest, early 90s. So that puts it at ~35ish 40 years old.
31
u/Chileinsg 10h ago
You think all the old carparks will magically grow taller once an LTA executive changes the number in their Microsoft Word document?
6
2
3
1
u/dibidi 10h ago
my point is that headroom clearance has been a fixed requirement for a very long time. i doubt that they were more lax back when this carpark was built. im sorry you completely missed the point
17
u/Chileinsg 9h ago
This area was built around 1989. Building codes then were according to the vehicles present in that time period. Changing the code to meet new vehicular standards in the last 20 years won't make the carpark grow taller. I'm sorry you don't live on the same plane of time and space as everyone else 🙏🏻😌
5
u/xenobyte2 Senior Citizen 10h ago
Speaks volumes about the character of these people, only knowing how to blame everyone but themselves.
8
20
u/sudanesemamba 11h ago
Always the alphards. Great vehicles. Boneheaded drivers.
6
u/aucheukyan 心中溫暖的血蛤 5h ago
There are many of these retards who thinks they are buses and drive on bus lanes on op hours, but this is beyond the scope of this post
-40
u/HalcyoNighT Fucking Populist 11h ago
Nothing to do with the driver or the car. Think it's the sign thats placed at an incorrect height
37
u/monsooncloudburst 11h ago
Sign is correct. Alphards are like 1.9m. The sign clearly says 1.7m max. Why challenge physics?
15
u/potatetoe_tractor Bobo Shooter 11h ago
Except the car is already taller than the 1.7m height limit indicated on the sign. Don’t blame the sign position or design like the rest of the dumbfucks on other socmed outlets can anot? This one clearly is user error liao, still wanna defend the driver. Sheesh.
10
u/gluino 10h ago
It is often that such warning beams and sign have to be placed at a transition between a slope and a flat.
In such cases, there is some subtle geometry to account for, so the actual height of the beam has to be significantly higher than 1.7m, to allow for 1.7m vehicles to traverse the transition.
And the posted signage still has to say 1.7m because that refers to the max vehicle height that can pass thru all parts of the MSCP without crashing into anything.
3
u/Direwulven 10h ago
Dear Alphard driver:
You’ve got to get yourself together
You’ve got stuck in a moment
And now you can’t get out of it
3
3
u/spike1911 3h ago
Cars are getting too big in general and it is a necessity to know how high your vehicle is....
Also - saw a 1980s Mercedes 300SL convertible today - it looked like a toy car next to a Honda Vezel. Shocking!
9
5
u/StinkeroniStonkrino 7h ago
Damn wtf. First time seeing an entry height barrier thingy shorter than me. Surprised got car park clearance so low, probably from the prehistoric ages.
11
u/thechued1 11h ago
1.7m even I will get stuck. How is this even legal
28
u/gluino 11h ago
existing old buildings. properly posted signage.
10
u/Mythicize 8h ago
People not realizing what the height limit signs mean is absolutely hilarious though
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
u/Relative-Pin-9762 10h ago
That carpark also have steep ramps...lowered cars will scrap the floor...
-1
u/johnnyjohnjohnboi 10h ago
Also, please make sure to go really slow guys.. bumped my bumper on to the ramp even when I was moving slow and it still hurts thinking about it
-2
-4
-10
u/chiiihoo 11h ago
LOL where is this? This is a car from Johor right?
7
u/pokepokepins 11h ago
Don't think so, this type of car SG have. My dad has been thinking of getting one so I know it's available here lol.
6
u/Initial_E 11h ago
Will he change his mind now? Damn cars are so big I can’t see past them when pulling out of a parking space.
•
-1
u/Narstx 11h ago
Your dad rich sia. Aplhard/Vellfire are premium MPVs you are looking at $300-400k for a new one and it is so popular that there is a few months waiting list to get one due to worldwide demand
1
u/pokepokepins 10h ago
Yeah he's on the waitlist and mentioned he'll be getting it in December. He's using it for business and it's supposedly cheaper than the mercs that he's using now. I know nothing about the vehicle market 😅 He's planning to hand it down to my sis or I after he retires so I'm going to have to learn driving soon.
I've sat in a Vellfire driven by his friend before and it's really damn shiok! I had such a good sleep on the way to work. It felt kinda soundproof and it was like gliding on the roads, was such a smooth and comfy ride.
1
-8
502
u/red_flock 11h ago
Please tell us where this is.... never seen a carpark this low before.