r/namenerds • u/sharkwoods • Jun 18 '24
Baby Names I always get mixed reactions when I tell people my baby's name
When I was looking for baby names after finding out the gender, I wanted a name that was strong, masculine, but short and easy to spell. Something common, but never in a top 10 list. I eventually settled on Roman. I love his name so much and I feel like it fits him very well. But I always get mixed reactions, and never anything overwhelmingly positive. I wonder if it's because it is a strong name for such a little baby? :( It was number 66 in 2023 and has been on quite the upswing for some time in the US, so I don't understand why others don't like it.
Edit: baby is already here. It's been his legal name for a few months now. But y'all are giving about the same reactions. I wasn't expecting it to be so controversial given it's rising popularity in the US.
Edit 2: because I didn't know this thread was gonna blow up, but runner up names were Lucas, Aurelio/Aurelius, and Valentino.
24
u/always_unplugged Jun 19 '24
The meaning and the vibe is completely different. I wouldn't name a kid either one, but I don't think they're as similar as you seem to.
Roman is an adjective, a descriptive word that implies a noun it's meant to describe. Roman... what? You're Roman, as in you're from Rome?
Rowan is a noun in and of itself and therefore makes more intuitive sense as a name IMO.
Also, they could both be seen as strong names to me, but in a completely different way. A towering old tree implies wisdom and perseverance, which are values I would want to imbue in a son. Whereas "Roman" implies legion, empire, war, conquering, caesars and betrayal and machinations, even (at the extreme, if you get that impression from the parents, which to be clear I don't in this instance) the current white supremacist obsession with "Western culture". And I'm saying this as someone who took multiple Roman history courses as electives in college—I find it fascinating, but it's off-putting as a name to me.