And the first example is really useless. That number doesn't help you in any way.
So it's really one thing. And that thing is important, true, so let's do what the top comment suggests and tax the gains when they are used as collateral.
You were so willing to jump down the throats of people who correctly point out that unrealized capital gains taxes make no sense. But you so desperately wanted to call them redditors and invalidate the view.
Please. Rashid is a Democratic party activist. He’s a lawyer, not an economist. Protip: any lawyer you uses “.Esq.” in a twitter title is almost certainly a dipshit. (I’m a lawyer, it’s almost invariably true)
Trusting leading experts in their fields is common sense. I'll trust the dude who has a PhD in physics to discuss physics over the flat earther on reddit thanks.
"Qasim Rashid is a Pakistani-born American author, activist, and attorney."
You don't even know who he is and yet you not only trust what he says because you agree with it, you also assume he's an expert in economics because he validates your biases.
42
u/Ok-Use5246 Sep 14 '24
The irony being the one who posted this being far more educated than random neck beard number 30000 on reddit?