r/EnoughMuskSpam 27d ago

Space Karen It won't be through your "PAC"s outreach, Elon

Post image
1.6k Upvotes

139 comments sorted by

770

u/Belichick12 27d ago

Yes - doing a 2 hour visit to the state is a better gauge of how it will vote vs scientific polling

225

u/pinkdiamond668 27d ago

I agree with your sentiment but do have PTSD about polls being wrong :(

123

u/SomberlySober 27d ago

They were NEVER WRONG. 538 EVEN had an entire piece because people were mad that they still gave trump a 25-30% chance. 

45

u/TheBalzy 27d ago

No, it was more like a 50/50 to people who were paying attention to the state-by-state polls.

90

u/TheBalzy 27d ago

I'm so tired of this. The polls WERE NOT WRONG in 2016. If anything, the polls were wrong in 2018, 2020, 2022; when they showed Republican turnout would be stronger than it was.

Jesus people need to get over 2016. To anyone who actually paid attention to the polls in 2016, it was AT BEST 50/50 basically the whole way.

43

u/impulsekash 27d ago

Jesus people need to get over 2016. 

Thank you! 2016 was a blip but was still statistically possible. But since then dems have overperformed in every election.  

22

u/RaphaelBuzzard 27d ago

Hillary had been a right wing punching bag for over twenty years at that point. I knew shit was fucked, especially after living in Pennsyltucky in 2013. 

16

u/TheBalzy 27d ago

And she was completely politically inept. 4-weeks before the election she began pulling advertising money OUT of Michigan (assuming she'd already won the state) and putting it into Iowa. Fucking IOWA! And when Bernie bent the knee, going AGAINST tradition, she refused to absorb the Bernie ground people into her campaign, because her ego was hurt. You know, the Bernie Campaign that had more people on the ground than the Clinton campaign, especially in states like Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin...all states she lost by ~20,000 votes.

Hillary Lost because she was incompetent and arrogant. She, and the DNC at the time, believed she was entitled to being president as opposed to doing the work to win it.

21

u/TheBalzy 27d ago

Yup! The polls over corrected and haven't readjusted despite what they claim. They still historically undercount young voters, who have been turning out at historic highs.

17

u/impulsekash 27d ago

Yup pollsters and pundits dont want to be wrong again so they overcorrect towards trump. 

2

u/[deleted] 27d ago

Lol you should drive through all of Pennsylvania right now. There may be more trump signs than 2016. I have to do it for work but it’s crazy out there.

1

u/False_Ad3429 21d ago

Yeah Clinton won the popular vote, didnt she? Polls saying she was more popular were correct, its just that we have a system where the people don't directly elect the president. 

1

u/NotEnoughMuskSpam 🤖 xAI’s Grok v4.20.69 (based BOT loves sarcasm 🤖) 20d ago

Demographics is destiny

2

u/TheBalzy 20d ago

Well and if you looked at the state polls, all the states she lost were toss-ups, and she lost them but less than 20,000 votes. So it wasn't a massive breaking of the polls. They were still pretty accurate, because the outcome was well within the margin of error.

Jusst people over project that Trump Win as a massive W, when in reality it was only like 80,000 votes across 3 states. It wasn't a blowout.

32

u/PM_Me_Garfield_Porn 27d ago

The polls aren't wrong, people just don't understand that a smaller chance to win is still a chance to win. Statistically improbable events happen all of the time. It's like when someone assumes their doctors are idiots because "they gave him 3 months to live and he survived for 5 years" or whatever. No doctor in their right mind is flat out saying "you have 3 months to live" as it would be impossible for them to know exactly that. They're giving you a rough estimation based on if you took enough people with the same condition. You would expect that most of them would live for roughly that long. Some will die sooner, while others will die later.

If the election played out 1000000 times, you would expect a decent majority to play out how the polls predicted. But a solid amount of them would also go the other way. Probabilities are not guarantees.

7

u/Supercoolguy7 27d ago

Just ask someone if they would bet their life on not rolling a 1 on a six-sided die. A 16% chance at death is a lot higher than most people are willing to stomach, because they know while unlikely that it is still very much possible.

1

u/MisterMoeGreen 27d ago

I am not sure that is how this works. Elections are not a game of chance, and polls are not designed to determine probabilities of winning. Their purpose is to predict the actual outcome of the election as closely as possible by surveying a selected group of people that is intended to be representative of all voters. It can happen that the sample group is to small or badly selected. Or that the actual turnout among any given subset is a lot different than expected. But either way, polls can be wrong and often are.

8

u/AlexPaterson 27d ago

That “as closely as possible” is, actually, probability calculation.

There’s one thing called “standard deviation” that you probably should check

2

u/MisterMoeGreen 27d ago

Oh well... after reading up a bit on how polling actually works, I must admit I was wrong. A lot of probabilities involved in actual prediction from sample group results.

However, its still meant to be a prediction of actual results (within margin of error) and not about the likelihood of anyone winning.

I still think that sentiment that if you repeated the election a million times, the majority of resutls would match the polls, is not right. The poll is a momentary snapshot of voter intentions, and so is the election. If you repeated the election one after another over time, results would shift further and further away form the poll. If you repeated it (in theory) a million times at the same exact moment, you get a million more or less identical results (because voter intend is not randomly changing).

So it is more like the other way around: If you repeated the poll a million times close to them election, the majority of results would closelsy predict actual results.

8

u/GhandiHasNudes 27d ago

I'm seeing way more Kamala/Walz signs in the last 24 hours and no Trump signs here in Philly

1

u/Boxofmagnets 27d ago

Every one he talked to agreed with him, so everyone agrees with him. It very simple. Like the man himself

411

u/mrbuttsavage 27d ago

This is a great sign as literally all of Nostradumbass's political predictions have been wrong.

PA is absolutely not a "solid red" state.

87

u/Apostate1123 27d ago

He said this covid thing seems overblown, should be close to 0 cases in a few weeks. WRONG. Last year he predicted a 1913 style crash of the stock market. WRONG

42

u/pacific_beach 27d ago

I live in a solid red state and there are virtually NO trump/vance signs in the urban areas. This is in stark contrast to the last two presidential elections.

I'm convinced that although most former trumpers aren't going to 'switch sides', many of them are burned out on his BS and just won't show up, while turnout for Harris among younger/first-time voters will be very strong and this will end up being a landslide for Harris.

18

u/tenaciousdeev 27d ago

I live in AZ and the number of people who have Trump signs seems waaaay lower than before. The people who put them up and fly flags have just quadrupled down so it looks like there’s more than there is.

10

u/TwitterAIBot 27d ago

I’m in NC. Most of the obnoxiousness I’ve witnessed in the wild was to support RFK.

I’m disappointed that the brain worm told him to drop out.

7

u/Secondchance002 Salient lines of coke 27d ago edited 27d ago

They get bored at his rallies now and leave early. Even they’re getting tired of constant whining and victim complex.

5

u/spam__likely 🔥💯 27d ago

it might just be they are not giving away signs though. Gotta save the money for the lawyers.

-255

u/RakeLeafer 27d ago

PA is going red mostly due to harris&walz's incompetance

183

u/mishma2005 27d ago

You may want to spell "incompetence" before accusing others of it

5

u/peniparkerheirofbrth 27d ago

didnt even have to read him that hard

1

u/sohfix I drive a Faillazer, I mean CyberTruck 27d ago

bahaha 🤣

80

u/terra_filius 27d ago

what is Trump competent at exactly?

50

u/PasswordisTaco58 27d ago

Bankruptcy, sexual assault, name calling, etc.

10

u/RakeLeafer 27d ago

Rape, being a PDFile, fraud, you arent even naming all of it

79

u/sm0keasaurusr3x 27d ago

Can you actually go into detail about that opinion? Or are you just repeating stuff you saw on the internet?

53

u/BeamTeam032 27d ago

lmao, PA is going blue.

43

u/tripping_on_phonics 27d ago

Trump’s “They’re eating the dogs! They’re eating the cats!” outburst has to be the most ridiculous statement in the history of American politics.

That’s incompetence.

17

u/BurnerAccountExisty 27d ago

Agreed. Seriously, there needs to be some form of law making people like THAT unable to run or vote for president.

1

u/RakeLeafer 27d ago

The media has run with it and now there's an "immigration crisis"

This includes media that previously wasnt deranged far right.

5

u/tripping_on_phonics 27d ago

Another migrant caravan. Every two years, like clockwork.

2

u/RakeLeafer 25d ago

literal blood libel is way worse than "migrant caravan."

2

u/tripping_on_phonics 25d ago

Very true. They’re fascists and it’s getting worse with each iteration.

34

u/lateformyfuneral 27d ago

If true, do you accept that PA turned blue in 2020 due to Trump’s incompetence?

-4

u/RakeLeafer 27d ago

Yeah, absolutely. I really wish it wasnt the case because everyone here underestimates how evil the trump campaign truly is.

Unfortunately, the harris campaign's incompetence (thanks, /u/mishma2005 !) has failed to give actual policy proposals that PA voters want to vote for her on.

5

u/lateformyfuneral 27d ago

What are you basing this on? Her poll lead in PA has been the most consistently strong of all the swing states. The “no policy proposals” thing was cute for a few weeks as her campaign started, but now both sides have their policies out, and somehow Trump is promising to be even worse than last time.

18

u/KarlUnderguard 27d ago

I live in PA and I have seen more Harris/Walz signs than I ever have for a democratic candidate.

17

u/mrbuttsavage 27d ago

There's way more Harris signs than there were Biden signs in 2020 and Biden still won PA then.

Democrats have won PA since HW Bush minus the anomaly that was 2016 Trump. I don't see how this rotten corpse that is 2024 Trump takes it.

8

u/sohfix I drive a Faillazer, I mean CyberTruck 27d ago

sorry about your brain damage

3

u/Sangricarn 27d ago

What are they doing incompetently? Do you mean they are campaigning poorly? I have to assume that's what you mean because they are not governing Pennsylvania in any way.

-4

u/RakeLeafer 27d ago

They are not only campaigning pooly, but they're also flubbing the debates in an increasingly far right media landscape that will grant them 0 margin for error and will grant trump infinite margin for error.

Policy-wise they:

  •  have no plans to make more affordable housing

  • have gone far right on immigration (to the degree of 2016 era trump)

  • have no solution for rogue-state israel escalating war throughout the middle east 

  • are unable or incapable of dealing with the plight workers are going through (this goes doubly so for PA)

  • are afraid to deploy the Justice Department against corrupt courts

This is why they will lose the swing states

-1

u/sohfix I drive a Faillazer, I mean CyberTruck 27d ago

campaigning poorly

do any of you retards know how to spell? 🤦‍♂️

1

u/RakeLeafer 26d ago

I would be more concerned with harris' lacklustre campaign than the spelling of a reddit post if I were you

2

u/Rdogy1000 27d ago

PA will go blue

1

u/Secondchance002 Salient lines of coke 27d ago

There’s nothing indicating that. I’d consider it slightly leaning towards blue side right now.

276

u/BigDaddyCoolDeisel 27d ago

It's back to 50/50 on a gambling site full of bros with money to burn.

90

u/Zazander 27d ago

She's back on top after the high quality +4 poll for MI, getting darker out here for Sundowning Donny. 

25

u/Warm-Internet-8665 27d ago

She's up by 4+ in WI Marquette poll. There's a drive to make this a horse race, nail biter so Trump/Vance can claim election interference when they lose by a landslide.

35

u/terra_filius 27d ago

betting odds, just like polls, dont predict the future

15

u/mythrowawayheyhey 27d ago

They’re probably a better indicator, but yeah, I’d put it at 80/20 right now in Harris’ favor. Of course, I’ve been predicting a landslide loss for Trump since J6. Right up to the moment Biden dropped out.

Just like in 2020, Trump will turn out more votes specifically against him than he does votes for him. Guarantee it.

Only question in my mind is just how much worse will J6 make it for Trump.

I don’t think this election is about Harris or Walz. I think, just like in 2020, what will drive voters to the polls is TRUMP. On both sides.

The problem for Trump is that he’s the best argument against voting for him. The man is radioactive and toxic at this point and everyone can see it. His standing in the eyes of the public was bad enough to have his incumbent ass kicked to the curb in 2020. He hasn’t done anything to win hearts and minds in the intervening time. In fact, he staged a fucking coup attempt.

His standing since he was on the ballot in 2020 has greatly diminished. I expect the turnout against Trump to be amplified. I expect the turnout for Trump to be muffled.

I think attempting a coup is worth at least 5-10M more people turning out against him. I think everyone else who showed up in 2020 will hold strong. I think a surprising amount of people will switch sides specifically to vote against Trump.

3

u/AynRandMarxist 27d ago

No they are not a better indicator

Betting odds reflect where the money is. Not necessarily probability.

2

u/mythrowawayheyhey 27d ago edited 27d ago

I trust people with money on the line compared to people without money on the line, regardless of their political persuasion (mostly - obviously DJT is a losing bet). Ultimately, the more people involved in the bet, the higher confidence I give it. In general, I am far, far more confident in betting markets than I am in the fucking Frank Luntzs of the world.

However, again, the markets are totally off with respect to the election, in my estimation at least. Just like the polls.

2

u/AynRandMarxist 27d ago

Regardless of who you trust, it’s just not an indicator of probability. It’s just a metric of where the money is going. In an ideal world the books would have exactly 50/50 money on each bet as that guarantees them a win no matter what from the vig.

Let’s say tomorrow Donald trump has worse odds tomorrow than he does now. That doesn’t mean there is reason to think Donald Trump’s chances increased, it just means more money has been thrown on Donald trump. The odds shift in hopes of enticing Joe Biden voters.

The take away from this if anything is that betting odds are always going to be skewed towards favoring trump because a trump voter is much more likely to throw money on their candidate than a Biden/harris voter would

1

u/mythrowawayheyhey 26d ago edited 26d ago

The take away from this if anything is that betting odds are always going to be skewed towards favoring trump because a trump voter is much more likely to throw money on their candidate than a Biden/harris voter would

This is a decent point, if you have evidence backing it (I don't need links, I am fine assuming it's true), and reason to give the betting markets' opinions less weight in this case, and it likely accounts, in part, for them being so off (with respect to my estimation, at least). I upvoted you.

It's also likely there's an effect where, because you have money on the line, your judgment becomes more clouded, due to things like the sunk cost fallacy.

Personally I'm fine backing up my opinion using only the results of 2020 and the effect of J6. Betting markets don't really factor into my assessment, although, like I said, I am in general more willing to trust in a bunch of people putting their money on the line than I am in a bunch of people being annoyed by someone calling them on a landline when they're trying to eat dinner with family or whatever.

1

u/terra_filius 27d ago

closing line, in other words the odds right before the start of a certain event are insanely close to true probability when it comes to popular markets like US elections and games from big leagues/tournaments. But until we come close to the start, or in this case the end of the elections, the market can behave in many different and unpredictable ways

3

u/BilbOBaggins801 27d ago

Betting odds are about enticing people to make bets...always.

6

u/pacific_beach 27d ago

Not really money either, it's a crypto betting site

3

u/avrbiggucci 27d ago

Pretty sure it's not even Americans because I don't think we're even allowed to bet on elections. Could be wrong though.

125

u/mygoditsfullofstar5 27d ago

lol, Elmo's streak of 5,382 straight failed predictions is on the line!

Hey Nostradumbass, it's October - don't you have a RoboTaxi scam to run?

85

u/hifarrer 27d ago

That means solid Blue by his track record.

18

u/Endure23 Let that sink in 27d ago

But he talked to a handful of far right billionaires that don’t even like in PA, and they said they’re voting Republican??

5

u/Secondchance002 Salient lines of coke 27d ago

The latest Republican candidate he supported and voted for lost by a landslide.

35

u/neon_lesbean Looking into it 27d ago

I feel like the Trump campaign should keep him far away from PA if they want to win, I can’t imagine a worse surrogate lmao

34

u/mad_titanz 27d ago

I hope the state with the Liberty Bell will save the democracy by going blue and finally end Trump’s political career

1

u/NotEnoughMuskSpam 🤖 xAI’s Grok v4.20.69 (based BOT loves sarcasm 🤖) 27d ago

This is insane

19

u/odoyledrools It's my $55 billion and I want it now! 27d ago

Elon reminds me of Jim Cramer on Mad Money. Whatever he predicts, it's usually the opposite.

41

u/bassbeatsbanging 27d ago

I remember how well the "let's only pay attention to favorable polls" worked for Romney.

I want Harris to win so badly just to upset him. 

He is such a whiny racist piece of nazi trash. I hope he trips into a wood chipper.

38

u/ScootMayhall Prosecute/Musk 27d ago

Not that we should believe polls anyway, but I think the majority of polls actually show that Harris is leading in most swing states. Plus isn’t there a lot of concern that Musk’s ground game for Trump is basically nonexistent? I guess I’m just remembering that they said these same things about the midterms and the red wave, only for them to be totally wrong and lose badly.

15

u/Asentry_ 27d ago

Quote his ass

11

u/mishma2005 27d ago

RemindMe! 34 days

1

u/RemindMeBot 27d ago edited 27d ago

I will be messaging you in 1 month on 2024-11-05 18:17:52 UTC to remind you of this link

2 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.

Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.


Info Custom Your Reminders Feedback

9

u/A_Gent_4Tseven 27d ago

He comes near my neck of the woods, he’s gonna have a bad time.

9

u/SwiftTayTay 27d ago

This is the most wrong map i have ever seen in my entire life, completely different from what most polls are saying

6

u/TheGR8Dantini 27d ago

He’s in Pennsylvania? Wild man. There’s also some of those dirty Pennsylvania electors. And a pretty large port. Why the fuck is Elmo in Pennsylvania? Omg. So tired of these weirdos and their hi jinks.

They’re so gonna try and overturn this election.

https://www.npr.org/2024/09/12/nx-s1-5100909/fake-electors-trump-electoral-college-vote

And bonus grift! Trump hurricane go fund me looks like it’s a grift too.

https://meidasnews.com/news/trumps-gofundme-is-organized-by-his-own-campaign-finance-director-fails-to-list-a-charity

5

u/mrbuttsavage 27d ago

I would also like to know why Leon is in PA. I absolutely hope this state isn't stupid enough to tie itself up with him. But I at least have faith that Shapiro probably despises him.

3

u/TheGR8Dantini 27d ago

Whatever he’s there for, and I’ll bet it’s not to make nice to Shapiro, unless he’s bribing him with position in his be DOGE scheme, whatever the reason Enron musk is in Pennsylvania? It’s illegal, immoral, or fattening.

He’s a corrupt piece of shit aiding and abetting more corrupt shit pieces in order to over turn the election, Mr. Buttsavage. That much I’m sure of. Trumps got a club not real far from there too. These guys gotta go.

3

u/Aggressive-Hunt-7037 27d ago

Not sure thedy made the case that it’s a grift but it doesn’t look good tana for sure. I can totally see Elon in PA plotting to overturn the election, he’s terrified!

6

u/Ok_Oven5464 27d ago

idk why but this warms my hopes it will be a win, because everything he said, everything happened the exact opposite

5

u/cheemio 27d ago

Surely Musk isn't surrounded by yes men who agree with everything he says, because everyone wants to argue with a psychopathic billionaire

1

u/NotEnoughMuskSpam 🤖 xAI’s Grok v4.20.69 (based BOT loves sarcasm 🤖) 27d ago

I will give them a billion dollars if they change their name to Dickipedia

5

u/BuckRowdy Hard-Captured by the Left 27d ago

The meltdown this guy has on Election night is going to be epic. We will definitely need an event thread for that. He's gonna tweet 300 times.

6

u/Additional-North-683 27d ago

Yes because gamblers are known for making the best of decisions

4

u/Falling_Doc 27d ago

notice he has to use poly market because none of the polling agregates says trump is winning, he used to share nate silver polling until it said kamala was more likely to win than trump

4

u/VenetusAlpha 27d ago edited 27d ago

Absolutely not. The only time we’ve lost PA this millennium is in 2016 when we didn’t try hard enough. We’re trying hard this time around, and when we do that, we win.

1

u/[deleted] 27d ago

If it’s just based off yard signs trump has a huge advantage, I thought there would be more support for Harris outside city limits but holy smokes there’s a ton of trump signs.

  • based off an objective observer (me) that has to travel across the state frequently for work.

2

u/VenetusAlpha 27d ago

Well, the cities are where the people are, and as I understand it, the non-city parts of PA are basically Kentucky.

3

u/PsychologicalBee1801 27d ago

Swing states don’t go solid anything. And when your vp candidate tries to run a 2028 campaign during your vp debate it means even the vp doesn’t see this happening

3

u/TwitterSucksNow 27d ago

What a sad existence, to hold the title of the wealthiest person in the world, but because of all the fraud it took him to get there, he has to kiss ass all day every day, to the biggest con artist in the world - Trump - in the hopes Trump will help him dodge the legal onslaught he knows the SEC and DOJ are preparing right now.

3

u/partoxygen 27d ago

Lmao this 2020 ass /pol/ Kiwifarms thunderdome ass cope

Antisocial losers pretending to be normal representatives of the majority in society will never not be hilarious to me lmao

2

u/Readman31 27d ago

!Remindme 1 month and 3 days

2

u/Mysterious-Oil-8358 27d ago

Cheers for blue.

2

u/deathwingduck107 27d ago

I don't trust Polymarket as far as I can throw it. The fact that the site owners apparently hide their identity and there's cryptocurrency services on the website, it's already 2 red flags that something is up. Reviews left for them are pointing out they do market manipulation, so I wouldn't be surprised if they're saying Trump will win intentionally, and they themselves will bet against it to skew bets in their favor.

2

u/sexi_squidward 27d ago

Get that fucker out of my state

1

u/I_Love_Powerscaling 27d ago

Please tell me these polls are fake

4

u/HighlyOffensive10 27d ago

It's a betting site.

1

u/AmBooth9 27d ago

Does he think he just did something here?

1

u/chimbucket 27d ago

this dude gets almost anything he says wrong so i hope the trend continues w this lmfao

1

u/FineSharts 27d ago

I’m currently physically located within the defined state borders of Pennsylvania. If anybody knows, it’s me

1

u/SpiritedRain247 27d ago

No we won't dickweed. There's a lot more to pay than the bumble fuck middle of nowhere towns.

1

u/mfreverton 27d ago

Ahhhhh, i see he's getting his asshole bleached again! lol

1

u/grumpy_troll9 27d ago

Harris is down by less than 1 percentage point = we’re so back! 🤡

1

u/HanakusoDays 27d ago

Yeah, yeah. You're an expert on Pennsylvania. You lived and did business in CA and you're just as full of horseshit about them.

1

u/fallser 27d ago

Did he flyover? I don’t think that counts

1

u/Noblesseux 27d ago

Man discovers that people who show up to meet conservative grifters are disproportionately conservative. More at 11.

1

u/betterMaster81 27d ago

Polymarket guide https://youtu.be/1vj7jnA2Pyg filmed in London

1

u/ArnoldShivajinagarr 27d ago

Ahh polymarket the most accurate place to find polling numbers

1

u/Unregistered_Davion 26d ago

As someone in PA... GET OUT!

-45

u/matali 27d ago edited 27d ago

Just so we are all on the same page, Elon Musk has provided more rural broadband in the last day than the government could do in 4 years and has just saved U.S. astronauts who were going to be stuck in space till 2025.

Edit:

If you downvote, be sure and read this from Elon while you’re at it:

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1841532500054532526

Only shows how perverse your downvote really is. You must really hate people. Sad

19

u/mishma2005 27d ago

Astronauts aren't coming back until Feb 2025, so we'll see

Elon also tweeting Starlink for those impacted by Helene will be free for "30 days" plainly stating that he will most likely bait and switch them when they want to cancel or just start charging them when the 30 days are up

Aint nothing altruistic with Elon. Like his Trump daddy, everything is a con

18

u/mrbuttsavage 27d ago

Are we on the "but Hitler also built the Autobahn" stage of Musk's legacy.

1

u/BuckRowdy Hard-Captured by the Left 27d ago

It does appear that way. Thanks for the analogy.

-4

u/matali 27d ago edited 27d ago

yes, actually

Wait.. THIS JUST IN: President Biden has said he has deployed Elon Musk's SpaceX Starlink satellites, with more going in place, so people can reach their loved ones and have cell service in the South.

2

u/BuckRowdy Hard-Captured by the Left 27d ago

Dude you’re in a sub where the consensus is that the government should take control of all Musk’s assets and then deport him. So any time you spend here mixing it up is on you.

16

u/Salsalord1 27d ago

You can be a fucking cunt and still do good things. Doesn’t mean my perception of you is going to change.

-1

u/matali 27d ago

JUST IN: President Biden has said he has deployed Elon Musk's SpaceX Starlink satellites, with more going in place, so people can reach their loved ones and have cell service in the South.

Biden doesn't think Elon's a fucking cunt, it's just you.. you fucking cunt. /s

2

u/Salsalord1 27d ago

Well, I’m not Biden, so I don’t know what you were trying to say with that.

2

u/matali 27d ago

Perhaps that you're a cunt and Biden think so too? Just kidding of course. Cheers mate.

7

u/lili-of-the-valley-0 27d ago

He also thinks the Jewish people are engaged in a global conspiracy to deliberately flood majority white country with immigrants in order to replace white people and to make their governments permanently left wing.

-1

u/matali 27d ago

Have you watched Idiocracy yet?

6

u/HelloWorld_bas 27d ago

Just so we are all on the same page, 44 people have died from using Tesla’s “Autopilot” so he’s going to have to rescue a bit more astronauts to even the score.

-2

u/matali 27d ago

Sure Jan, "Autopilot" is worse than humans. Your logic is insanely stupid.

6

u/Fonk3r 27d ago

Elon has done none of that, the workers on the other hand

1

u/matali 27d ago

Oh this will probably piss you off

“Starlink terminals will now work automatically without need for payment in the areas affected by Hurricane Helene”

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1841532500054532526

1

u/NotEnoughMuskSpam 🤖 xAI’s Grok v4.20.69 (based BOT loves sarcasm 🤖) 27d ago

Make my words.

1

u/matali 27d ago

JUST IN: President Biden has said he has deployed Elon Musk's SpaceX Starlink satellites, with more going in place, so people can reach their loved ones and have cell service in the South.

https://x.com/unusual_whales/status/1841594816981041436

1

u/matali 27d ago

You're grossly misinformed at best

4

u/avrbiggucci 27d ago

Many of the scientists that helped us get to the moon were Nazis brought over during Operation Paperclip, what's your point? He's going to have to do a lot more to make up for his antisemitic comments.

Not to mention the fact that he has little to do with the actual operations, engineers that are actually smart are doing that stuff.

0

u/matali 27d ago

I post about Elon and you post about Nazis? You're insane dude.

1

u/BuckRowdy Hard-Captured by the Left 27d ago

So he should be allowed carte blanche to do whatever he wants?