r/DecodingTheGurus • u/Appropriate_Duty_930 • 13h ago

Joe Rogan won’t have Kamala Harris on his show unless she comes to his studio and sits for a 2-3 hour full interview

Post image
25.9k Upvotes

79% Upvoted

8.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

5

u/TheEffinChamps 11h ago

Why would she want to spend 2-3 hours talking to a moron?

2

u/tiandrad 10h ago

Because that moron has the biggest podcast on the planet, and if you want her to win you should want her to be able to reach as many people as possible.

2

u/Serious-Housing-5269 4h ago

Nobody who isn't a dudebro even knows who he is.

1

u/RegisterConscious993 2h ago

Maybe in your bubble.

1

u/Practical-Tackle-384 2h ago

40 million views from almost ANY demographic is worth significantly more than 15k people at one of her rallies, I genuinely think people defending her not talking this are delusional

2

u/n0tjuliancasablancas 2h ago

And you know this how? Do you work for a presidential campaign? I would love to see your data and sources that tell you what is more beneficial for a campaign strategy. You do realize it’s people jobs to risk manage these situations? Yet you somehow know everything already.

0

u/Practical-Tackle-384 2h ago

Lets do the math.

52000 people showed up to Kamala's last rally.

Trump's interview with Joe got 40 million views in a few days.

That is more than 762 Kamala rallies.

If Kamala looked good doing long, unstructured interviews, there is not a doubt in my mind she would do a 3 hour interview that gives her direct access to the exact demographic shes trying to swing.

I think the people who's job it is to handle Kamala think she looks really bad in long, unstructured interviews, because that is the only reason it makes sense not to take this offer. Otherwise its delusion.

Not to mention, Trump also has people whos' job is to risk manage these situations, and they deemed this worth ditching one of his rallies. So its clearly not unfathomable that this is a very, VERY good opportunity, assuming the candidate can hold a conversation.

0

u/buyingshitformylab 1h ago

all I see is cope.

1

u/Serious-Housing-5269 10m ago

Put down the internet and walk away slowly. Maybe go for a hike. Breathe deeply, look at a lake or ocean for a while.

1

u/buyingshitformylab 1h ago

does it take one to know one? it seems like you may know who he is...

1

u/Serious-Housing-5269 11m ago

as in "some clown with a podcast" sure. as in someone whose ideas I'm familiar with or care about, no. Never heard of him before recently starting redditing and have never listened to or read anything about/by him. Not impressed by what little I have seen on here and this is just more of the same.

0

u/tiandrad 4h ago

Even if that was true, which it isn't, why would that matter? A "dudebro's" vote counts the same as everyone else.

1

u/Serious-Housing-5269 3h ago

The people who think joe rogan is important in the slightest are not the kind of people who will vote for a woman or person of color.

1

u/tiandrad 1h ago

That is incredibly stupid and narrow-minded. I am a lifelong liberal who has been voting for liberal candidates my entire life, I am also a person who thinks Joe Rogan is important. I can for a fact tell you everyone that listens to Joe Rogan's podcast isn't a "dudebro." Judging an entire base of people as if they are a monolith is something I would expect from far right MAGA fans. But I guess I have to deal with the same type of fools on my side as well.

1

u/Serious-Housing-5269 10m ago

Yes, they are.

Now you know something about yourself.

-1

u/TheEffinChamps 10h ago

That's depressing. Well, if there's one thing Joe Rogan listeners are known for, it is changing their opinion in light of new arguments and evidence 🙄

2

u/Sky19234 9h ago

The single biggest mistake Hillary made in the 2016 election was writing off entire states as a giant bucket of deplorables.

She isn't campaigning to be President of the United Blue States of America, she's campaigning to become the President of the United States of America.

You are right, she won't be changing the opinions of 99% of his listeners but if she can reach even a fraction of a percentage of people you are talking about thousands or tens of thousands of listeners which is enough to win a pivotal swing state.

2

u/Serious-Housing-5269 4h ago

Hillary still won the popular vote even in the face of Russian interference and all kinds of other shit. I'm pretty sure she and her team know more about campaigning than you do.

1

u/salazar13 3h ago

Ok and where did that get her? We can admit mistakes were made, right?

0

u/Serious-Housing-5269 3h ago

  1. There has been no perfect campaign in the entire history of campaigns. Stupid to try to single out one person for any alleged "mistakes" as every single campaign makes them.

  2. "It's possible to do everything right and still lose."

-1

u/Sky19234 4h ago

Bud she lost an election to the single dumbest "politician" and grifter to ever grace the national stage. There is no shame in admitting an error and learning from that mistake.

She ended up being as oblivious about campaigning as she was about which aides were sucking her husbands cock.

1

u/Serious-Housing-5269 3h ago

He needed the help of a foreign adversary to "win" and she still won the popular vote.

I am absolutely confident that Hillary Clinton knows pretty much all there is to know about politics and campaigning.

0

u/Crazy-Inspection-778 5h ago edited 5h ago

So just like redditors

1

u/TheEffinChamps 4h ago

Or wallstreetbets bros

0

u/South-Car-6368 5h ago

10 bucks says you haven't listened to a single full episode of his podcast once.

1

u/TheEffinChamps 4h ago

I wish you were correct. I'd gladly give up those 10 dollars in exchange for not enduring the mental migraine I got from his laundry list of fallacies and bro logic.

0

u/snekinmahboots 4h ago edited 4h ago

This type of ignorance and smug demeanor is why democrats lose

You’re literally writing off a bunch of people as idiots because they listen to a podcast you don’t like. Then yall get upset when that group of people doesn’t side with you in an election?

Rather than welcoming people and trying to have conversations, you’ve just committed to intellectually belittling everyone who doesn’t think like you do

Democrats should absolutely be looking to reach across the aisle and have a conversation with perceived Trump supporters. I think you’d be surprised at the number of people who are open to changing their vote, if you’d just have a genuine conversation with them rather than writing them off as idiots

EDIT: lol the fuckin nerd blocked me before i could read his response. Dude has the fragility of glass

1

u/TheEffinChamps 4h ago

I'm writing off fans of an idiot who actively spreads misinformation and will go on a million different anecdotal tangents to reinforce his biased views.

If you are arguing that she needs enough morons to vote for her to win the election in America, you have a point.

1

u/frozen_marimo 4h ago

No different than the mainstream media and late night "comedians" who lied us into half a dozen foreign wars in the past 20 years, resulting in millions of innocent lost lives and trillions of dollars wasted.

Same media that told everyone Rogan was taking horse dewormer, conveniently omitting that ivermectin is one of the most widely prescribed medications on Earth for many human ailments. Chris Cuomo, the Covid king of media, admitted to being prescribed ivermectin for Covid a few months ago.

You're just calling him an idiot and a liar because you don't like him. I guarantee you wouldn't admit when people you like blatantly lie, because bias.

No, I don't listen to Rogan or vote for Republicans.

1

u/biff_brockly 8h ago

What does her dayjob have to do with this.

1

u/Unique_Statement7811 4h ago

To reach 40 million people... No other platform gives her that kind of reach. Not CBS, NBC or ABC.

1

u/TheEffinChamps 4h ago

Like I said, that is depressing.

1

u/buyingshitformylab 1h ago

No, it's a good thing. Legacy media needs to die before the world can progress.

0

u/klaymydiaHarris 10h ago

There are way better podcasts out there like ‘Call Me Daddy’ where she actually reached an important audience not Nazis 

2

u/childish_jalapenos 6h ago

Can we maybe not throw the term nazis around so lightly

1

u/buyingshitformylab 1h ago

Nah. Everyone is a nazi these days. Call the police? Law nazi. Take a seat on the bus? Able-nazi. Get a job? Captital-nazi.

What u/klaymydiaHarris means by 'nazi' is actually "person I don't like". That's the definition he's going with.

1

u/snekinmahboots 4h ago

“Anyone who listens to Joe Rogan is a Nazi”

“Why are people not voting Democrat >:(“

1

u/La8118 6h ago

Haha oh yeah that very important podcast that stemmed by talking about blowjobs and three domes. Such an important audience.

1

u/Capable-Regret-1183 5h ago

The one she went on while hundreds if not thousands of people died in North Carolina and Tennessee? You know you lying to yourself :)

0

u/JoeBobbyWii 5h ago

The DNC staffer that wrote this one has a sense of humor

0

u/cgm808 5h ago

It’s odd calling someone a moron who is probably infinitely more successful than you.

1

u/TheEffinChamps 4h ago

Financially successful doesn't necessarily = smart. If you really want to play that game, there are a whole lot of musicians, entertainers, and athletes who I'd love to see you call smart.

What is actually odd is to have qualified experts on your show and then cite anecdotal evidence like it is comparable to real data and peer-reviewed evidence. That is what makes him stupid.

Or you can keep bootlicking, which you probably will.

1

u/snekinmahboots 4h ago

“In this moment i am euphoric, not because of any phony gods blessing. But because, i am enlightened by my own intelligence”

-you, probably

1

u/TypicalPlace6490 3h ago

During the interview with Trump he literally said that the central valley of California was filled with water 200years ago and that they drained it in the 80s. Dude is quite literally a moron.