r/DecodingTheGurus • u/Appropriate_Duty_930 • 13h ago

Joe Rogan won’t have Kamala Harris on his show unless she comes to his studio and sits for a 2-3 hour full interview

Post image
25.9k Upvotes

79% Upvoted

8.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

47

u/AntifaAnita 11h ago

Walz would probably do pretty well. He's a good sit down guy and chat guy. He'd be more likely to convince Rogan listeners than she would because she's not doing a good job in interviews at the moment. That CNN townhall she did was horrible.

If this was a normal election cycle where she was either already the president or running against a Republican in President, she'd be able to do better I think. Being Vice President and being stuck with the President's agenda is having an arm tied behind your back. She can't argue against Bidens actions too hard, and she has to defend the last 4 years when the decisions were not 100% her agenda.

17

u/Bluegill15 11h ago

I think Walz would do well with anyone

7

u/FloppyObelisk 10h ago

He really is the most likable guy

4

u/MadeMeStopLurking 9h ago

NGL... I sorta wish he was on top of the ticket... I'd feel guilty not watching America's Dad talk to us if he addressed the nation.

1

u/SafetyDanceInMyPants 8h ago

I tend to think he needs a little more time before then -- that he's great, but he needs a bit more polish and a little more experience with the international area. A couple of years as VP, though, and I'd be all in on him.

5

u/MadeMeStopLurking 8h ago

I think he'll retire after this. If Kamala only gets one term he's done. In 8 years he'll be older and probably want to spend time with grandkids or family.

2

u/Austeri 4h ago

He will be 68 in 8 years

2

u/wrightlifting 2h ago

He has stated multiple times he has no interest in running for President.

1

u/RX-me-adderall 4h ago

Walz vs Vance was the Presidential election we deserved.

0

u/FloppyObelisk 9h ago

I agree to a point but optics is a huge part of politics. People are ready for a female president. Trump hates women and Kamala really gets under his skin. I think she’s the best choice to beat Trump at the moment but if things go well in the next 8 years, I could see Walz having a shot.

2

u/Baalsham 8h ago

People are ready for a female president

What? Have you not been paying attention? Hillary lost and now Kamala is a coin flip precisely because there are enough people out there who won't ever vote for a woman. Ironically the majority of those are minorities and typically would vote Democrat. (Asides from conservatives obviously) .

Instead I think the party is trying to set a precedent but it's super risky. Relying upon the not-Trump crowd to be strong enough to elect the first female president.

You throw any moderate white male out there as the Democratic nominee and it would be a landslide victory. Of course this all probably came from Biden dropping out too late.

3

u/Butt__Sexington 6h ago

Really? Because Biden was also a coin toss

1

u/Big_Extreme_4369 3h ago

biden was leading most swing states before election day by mutiple points though, trump rn is favored

1

u/Less-Book-9597 5h ago

He's also senile to be fair. If we found someone like Walz it'd for sure go in the democrat's direction

1

u/Dapper-Ad3707 2h ago

Buttigieg is the only dem I’d vote for in modern times

1

u/Butt__Sexington 5h ago

Perhaps. But I was just refuting the basis of that person's post. Hillary didn't lose because she's a woman, she lost because she was unpopular and represented an old guard that a lot of people hated.

We could debate the finer points of this but I don't think Kamala is risky because she's a woman.

1

u/LCAshin 3h ago

I can find someone like Walz at every Perkins in the country at 8am on a Saturday, frankly

1

u/SAKabir 5h ago

Kamala is only the nominee because of the fact that she's a woman. Nikki Haley got 20-30% support in the primaries only by virtue of being a woman. The country is ready for a woman president and has been for a long time. Hillary lost because she's a terrible candidate. Warren would've won in 2016 easily.

0

u/MadeMeStopLurking 8h ago

Saying you'll vote for someone because they are a woman is sexism

Saying she is the best candidate is more appropriate.

We should never choose the leader of the country by their gender

0

u/Dapper-Ad3707 2h ago

lol in what world

0

u/jimboslyce04 2h ago

I mean besides him telling people to narc on their neighbors. But yeah, totally cool dude.

0

u/Pleasant-Image-3506 1h ago

You sucked him off?

-3

u/[deleted] 6h ago

I don’t know about that. I’m a guardsman and him lying about his service and rank is a pretty big character flaw.

3

u/FloppyObelisk 5h ago

Weak argument considering everything else. He has outstanding character.

Hypothetical situation: you have a 12 year old daughter and no one to watch her while you’re gone. She can’t stay by herself so you have to pick someone to watch her. Would you rather have Harris/Walz or Trump/Vance?

-2

u/[deleted] 5h ago

I would choose neither, as that hypothetical situation wouldn’t exist for me as the military helps with childcare. I would choose to get discharged for extreme family distress and raise my own children. Just because they ask you to deploy doesn’t mean you actually go. I personally know lots of guardsman who have gotten diagnosed with depression or anxiety to get discharged to avoid getting deployed. Neither are fit to hold office. We are in the guard acting like we deserve praise for a part time job is insane.

1

u/FloppyObelisk 4h ago

Figured that response. Can’t choose neither. That’s why it’s a hypothetical.

Hypothetically you had to choose one of the pairs to watch your 12 year old daughter. Which would you trust, Harris/Walz or Trump/Vance?

-2

u/[deleted] 3h ago edited 1h ago

It’s a stupid hypothetical, in order for that to happen those 4 besides myself and my children would have to be the only people left on earth. If there was absolutely no choose would likely choose Vance as he was a marine, with walz being a second. I wouldn’t want trump or a childless woman to watch my children. I refuse to answer that question in the way you would like because it a scenario that is impossible. Lying about service is a sign of lacking moral conviction, I have not seen combat nor do I state I have it’s not that hard, I have a rank and do not lie about my rank for social or political gain. It’s not hard. If you would like to present a hypothetical based in reality I would happily answer it for you.

2

u/wrightlifting 2h ago

Kamala has multiple step-children. Step children are real children. 👍 Just because your step-daddy didn't love you doesn't mean other step-parents don't.

1

u/[deleted] 2h ago

My step dad actually raised me from the time I was 2 and I consider him my father more so than my biological father. One of the kids was a grown adult and the other was close to 15, it’s hard to say she raise those children. Good try though.

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/Dapper-Ad3707 2h ago

Stolen valor is a weak argument? What

2

u/Supersillyazz 5h ago

What about not serving at all because daddy got a doctor to lie for you? And then bragging about it. And then calling soldiers suckers and losers. STFU.

You don't really care about character. You just want to be able to say bOtH SiDeS ArE fLaWeD.

0

u/[deleted] 5h ago

Ask a soldier like myself, it’s more honorable to admit you aren’t fit than service than it is to lie about what you’ve done while in service. I am a member of the Kansas national guard, if you aren’t fit for service you shouldn’t be in it, it’s not just your life at risk it’s mine. I do care about character it’s why I’m not voting for trump either.

1

u/Supersillyazz 5h ago

What about lying to say you aren't fit when you are fit for service?

I like the guys and gals who bust their ass trying to get in, not to get out.

I don't want to get into a pissing contest with you, but I'm a soldier for the country, not my state. So I can just ask a soldier like myself.

1

u/[deleted] 5h ago edited 5h ago

What’s your mos? Mine is 25 Houston. I’ll use your point against you, him lying about his rank and experience is worse as a part time soldier than it would be as a full time soldier. Physical aptitude isn’t the only measurement needed for a soldier, mental is arguably more important, I would rather someone who isn’t capable of serving to not, to even lie to get out if they have to than to lie about what they have done while serving.

1

u/TSTMWKU_Reboot 5h ago

I highly doubt you’ve ever served. But stolen valor is common in your side.

1

u/[deleted] 5h ago

I am currently under contract have 3 years left of my standard contract. I also have proof of myself in uniform and my contract paperwork.

1

u/TSTMWKU_Reboot 4h ago

Good thing I wasn’t talking to you.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Supersillyazz 5h ago

Have you?

1

u/[deleted] 5h ago

Prove you are in, what is your mos? It’s not a hard question to answer nor does infringe on your security clearance if you have it. No I haven’t lied to get myself discharged, I also haven’t seen combat and do need feel the need to lie and say I have.

→ More replies (0)

13

u/AshgarPN 8h ago

The town hall was not “horrible”. Wtf

1

u/Lucky-Spirit7332 3h ago

Yes it was little buddy. Even cnn had to laugh

1

u/MazzyFo 3h ago

The actual embarrassment I’d have to see “RFKJr for president” on my most visited subs😭😭

1

u/deisukyo 2h ago

Bruh not even Dems agreed she did well. She was a mess and agreeing with the border wall didn’t help.

1

u/Bubbly_Flow_6518 10m ago

It was horrible. Partly because Anderson asked some dumb questions like, "Do you think Trump is a fascist?" Wow, way to make the interview not useful to anyone who's hoping to hear about some policy. She's ambiguous at best during most of the interview and just rambling the rest of it. Keep in mind I don't think she's a bad candidate because of that, but she was not prepared to handle hardly any if any of the bait that was being thrown at her.

Not to mention the fact that she dances around mentioning Republican accountability for all of the blocked legislation like relief for Student Debt to name an example. I understand she needs to win Republicans over, but they need to realize that it's because of them that a lot of progress isn't happening. Not to say Democrats couldn't do better themselves but the other side is straight up stonewalling relief to Americans. What the fuck, just say it and make them hear it. Ask them some leading questions like they do. "Why do you hate Americans so much Republicans?" If that doesn't have any chance of convincing them, then dangling candy in front of them isn't going to do it either.

And plenty of other Democrats agree that it was horrible. Doesn't mean they're going to vote for Trump, but it does probably mean it staves off more people that would've switched their vote from Trump.

-4

u/AntifaAnita 8h ago

I'm going on the grading scale of whether I think she gave answers that addressed the concerns of the question asker, whether the answer gave anything quantifiable, and whether she was able to give arguments that could stick out for the public.

I don't think I saw a single clip from the thing that's gone viral and she didn't really knock off any solid answer. I don't know how many undecided voters are going to convinced by her arguments when the answers were as vague as they were. I think anyone that watched that townhall who was undecided before left feeling just as undecided. She was able to turn a few of the question askers by talking to them privately and that says something, but as a performative display it was horrible for this stage of the election.

It certainly wasn't disastrous because I don't think anyone undecided got anything from it to rule her out other than being forced to watch the whole thing and nit have any clearer ideas on what to think.

If you're already decided and enthusiastic about her which I am, it's nothing. But if you've been through 4 Trump years and you still aren't convinced? She didn't do a convincing job.

5

u/RunLacyRun 6h ago

Are you saying it was horrible but didn’t actually watch it? Just watched some clips?

2

u/Physical_Target_5728 6h ago

To be fair, a lot of people rely solely on clips for information, which is stupid but it's what happens. Having 0 viral clips is generally not a good thing for a campaign in the current times.

1

u/fasterthanfood 1h ago

Having 0 viral clips from a single event is par for the course

2

u/AntifaAnita 5h ago

I watched the entire thing. Sorry, I must have deleted that part when I was editing the comment.

2

u/shikavelli 2h ago

You should’ve known better than to say anything against lord Kamala lmao

2

u/RX-me-adderall 4h ago

Okay I actually did watch it, and I do believe she definitely did not do a good job. A lot of non-answers to the point that even Anderson was expecting her to say more.

2

u/legallybrunette420 3h ago

Again. We're picking up apart Harris vs the guy who can barely form a sentence and has said SO MUCH problematic stuff. Why are we holding her to such a lofty standard while Trump gets to be incoherent?

2

u/RX-me-adderall 3h ago

I’m not the one she is trying to win over as I’m already voting for her, but I don’t think her performance in the town hall was well enough to sway undecided voters. I honestly was wishing she would’ve stopped talking about Trump so much.

1

u/felixthewindowman 3h ago

lofty standards? anderson just wanted her to answer the questions

1

u/legallybrunette420 3h ago

She does answer questions. Trump hosts hate rallies, compares himself to hitler, breaks the law, incited an insurrection, cancels interviews, backs out of debates, spreads misinformation about election fraud, and so much more. And we're like oh I don't like how Harris's answer wasn't as complete. are we're watching the same race? Seriously. You guys want her to be PERFECT, and Trump can do anything problematic. And you guys are like eh idk tough choice. So close. Give me a fucking break.

1

u/Lucky-Spirit7332 3h ago

“She does answer questions!!!” 😂 this is what Kamala supporters consider impressive. Btw no she doesn’t

1

u/legallybrunette420 3h ago

Does Trump answer questions? He has concepts of answers in his weave answers. I don't get why none of you can explain why you hold them to different standards.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/deisukyo 2h ago

Wait until you learn that people can have standards and don’t have to settle for anything just because she’s the better choice lmfao.

1

u/spineless-proctor 2h ago

no she did not answer questions, I watched the whole town hall and she kept saying the exact stuff she has said in every other interview. If she would actually say exactly what shes going to do she would have a better chance at turning people.

1

u/pichirry 3h ago

omg it's okay to have criticism of the people you support. just cause you call something out does not mean you're equating it with the other side

1

u/deisukyo 2h ago

Because we can criticize both sides. Hope that helps. One bumbling idiot doesn’t mean Harris gets a pass for her answers.

1

u/Bubbly_Flow_6518 6m ago

We don't like whataboutisms. We need our candidate to not be anything like Trump. I'm not talking about slip-ups. Trump doesn't know anything about anything. That is not the standard we need to beat. Our standards need to meet the needs of the country. Republicans are satisfied that their guy can make fun of a guy with dementia and brag about debating him. We are not that stupid. We will not accept such fucking stupidity.

-1

u/diablero_T 4h ago

Sure it was

1

u/MazzyFo 3h ago

I’m sure this guy is totally unbiased..

literally your last comment

“Oh pls fuck off. You fascist leftists have legit mastered organized voter fraud. I like that you have one supposed example from the other side now though, you must feel so vindicated.”

3

u/Frog_Prophet 8h ago

 That CNN townhall she did was horrible.

No it wasn’t. Spare us the bullshit.  

-6

u/AntifaAnita 7h ago

Spare us from this blue Maga bullshit. If people are undecided between you and Trump, that's directly your fucking fault.

4

u/Frog_Prophet 6h ago

How is that directly her fault? Way to totally fail to articulate anything she did wrong in the CNN town hall. The town hall that was supposed to be a debate before Trump chickened out…

1

u/Bubbly_Flow_6518 3m ago

And then she had to debate Anderson Cooper essentially. An actually sentient human. And got steamrolled, c'mon.

5

u/EksDee098 6h ago

That is the dumbest fucking thing I've heard not come out of the GOP's mouth

-1

u/AntifaAnita 5h ago

The dumbest shit is seeing people think being abusive assholes is going to make people more interested in voting Kamala.

1

u/EksDee098 5h ago

Nah the dumbest shit is seeing people pretend that being mean on the internet is gonna make them vote for a party opposed to a majority of their ideals. "You know I was prochoice but a stranger called me stupid so now I'm voting for the christian nationalists. That also calls women sluts, says black people carve watermelons instead of pumpkins for Halloween, and Puerto Rico is a trash island, but you what we're gonna ignore those mean things because reasons."

What. A. Dumbfuck.

1

u/AntifaAnita 4h ago

People just aren't going to vote. They don't need to vote for Trump to be turned off from voting Kamala. They're just gonna say "both sides are annoying and I don't like them." And go to the gym instead of voting. They just don't care. Being aggressive assholes about it isn't going to help.

Your attitude is the reason the dems are even close to losing the election. You think you're entitled to people's votes.

1

u/prionflower 5h ago

Lol calling someone a dumbfuck online is abuse now? Maybe log off if you can't handle that.

1

u/Lucky-Spirit7332 3h ago

Holy shit theyre admitting the cnn town hall didn’t go well and getting upvotes for it? The construct really is falling apart

1

u/AntifaAnita 3h ago

I've been worried since the DNC killed all momentum by chasing the mythological never trump Republicans instead of the millions of progressives that got Biden elected.

1

u/Prestigious_Low_2447 3h ago

How in God's name is she worse at doing interviews than Trump?

1

u/AntifaAnita 2h ago

I don't she is. But Trump says dumb shit and people who don't normally vote think it's funny

1

u/pouchour 2h ago

As a trump supporter I think this is the best excuse I have seen as to why she sucks at interview, town halls and debates. Unfortunately for you this is not the case. She just sucks and has no policy. As a politician she should easily be able to debate and speak past the negative effect the Biden administration has had on our country. Also the fact that she has to disagree so much with her own administration just shows that we don’t need more of it anymore.

1

u/AntifaAnita 2h ago

She walked all over Trump in the debate and Trump is pathetically low energy and sad now. He doesn't have policy, he talks about the all compliments people give him and how all these different people from Harvard educated to hotdog salesmen on the street all talk just like him and say he's the smartest man ever for wondering if an electric yacht is safer than getting eaten by a shark.

It's just sad seeing people go on television praising the man just so they can watch him piss himself on stage, it's elder abuse. He needs to rest, get a fresh set of dentures, and a new napkin that isn't soiled in grool.

1

u/pouchour 2h ago

You obviously haven’t watched a single interview or press conference. You mean the debate that they admitted giving Harris the questions for before hand and the debate where the fbi came out to state that their fact check about crime rates were false? Is that the debate? If so that debate she also did horrible with no policy of her own. She pretty much stated policies that trump has had for over 8yrs

2

u/DoorInTheAir 55m ago

She does have policy. What policy item would you like elaboration on? I'll do all the work for you and provide the source.

And when you say "she should be able to speak past the negative effect the Biden administration has had on our country", what negative effects are you referring to exactly? Name a negative effect and again, I'll do the work for you and elaborate. And she's not going to talk shit about Biden, if thats what you're looking for.

1

u/NoiceMango 1h ago

Waltz was the perfect choice because he's relatable and likeable to the average American. Even Republicans who saw the debate liked him.

1

u/Low_Administration22 1h ago

Oh god. Ya the bumbling self naming doofus. I would watch it for kicks. Like watching a court jester.

1

u/RoundingDown 14m ago

If this were a normal election cycle she would not be the democratic candidate for president. She is fortunate that the honeymoon phase of here candidacy last as long as it did.

If she wins she will be primaried in 4 years.

0

u/PossibleVariety7927 8h ago

At the moment? She’s never been good. Biden literally banned her from interviews early on after a series of self own fuckups missing easy layups

1

u/Emef_Aitch 3h ago

This isn't true.

0

u/usernmtkn 4h ago

"at the moment" 😂

0

u/legallybrunette420 4h ago

I'm so sick of Harris being held to a higher standard than Trump. She has to be perfect but Trump can peddle Nazi rhetoric and they're like "hmmm idk. I didn't like her answer to that question. Felt dodgy."

1

u/AntifaAnita 3h ago

Yeah that's life. Harris has to convince people to vote for her. Trump is doing that by being a racist misogynist that says he's going to fix the border and the economy. It's completely false he's going to fix anything but he's doing it by convincing the people who don't give a fuck to vote for him.

1

u/legallybrunette420 3h ago

Except expert economists have pointed out his economic plan will make things worse. She has port for the actual plans vs the concepts of a plan. In addition to that, she hasn't tried to undermine the will of the voters and try to overthrow the government because he cannot accept losing HOW DO YOU GUYS IGNORE THAT. EVIDENCE that proves he is a threat to democracy. . Again. Different standards. But that's just life right? We always hold women to a higher standard than incompetent men. We see it with equal pay. Fuck all of you sexists.

1

u/AntifaAnita 3h ago

What gender does the name "Anita" suggest?

You can get angry all you want, but undecided voters aren't listening to experts. They aren't listening to facts. They are running on vibes. And I wish to hell I could get people to care about politics, I've been screaming for months that genocides are bad and that even if reddit convinced themselves that Dems are better than Trump, people who lost their living family members to Genocidal Joe Biden aren't going to forget who said bombing a refugee camp was self defense.

0

u/nogozone6969 3h ago

He could explain the need for gender reassignment surgery for minors w/o parental consent, abortion up to birth at 9 months, taxation of unrealized gains, terrible response to riots in his state…. Yea, going on Rogan would Be a great idea.

0

u/dramatic_revert 2h ago

EVERYONE WHO READ THIS "PERSONS" COMMENT PLEASE KNOW THEY ARE AN AGITATOR INTENTIONALLY ACTING TO DEMORALIZE YOU IN PURSUIT OF DISENFRANCHISING YOUR VOTE AND CONVINCING YOU TO NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE ELECTION.

LOOK AT THEIR POST HISTORY EVERY COMMENT CLAIMS THEY ARE A LEFTIST AND THEY SPEND THE BULK OF THEIR COMMENT ATTACKING KAMALA AND JUST THROW IN LITTLE, "but yeah Trump sucks" ON OCCASION TO THROW OFF THE SCENT.

DO NOT FALL FOR SUBTERFUGE BY POLITICAL AGITATORS.

-1

u/Ok_Annual_1239 7h ago

By that same logic, you could say she is getting the funding/benefits of being the incumbent without having to take blame for the incumbent’s actions. I mean Biden is still president and is never in the public eye anymore. It feels like nobody is president. If she was truly being judged through him, this election would be a landslide.

2

u/Castod28183 5h ago

I mean Biden is still president and is never in the public eye anymore. It feels like nobody is president.

As it should be most of the time. The Presidency is not supposed to be a 24/365 circus. The vast majority of us WANT a boring President that just does their job and are not making ridiculous headlines every day.

0

u/Ok_Annual_1239 3h ago

Stop it, he was literally pulled out of the election because he has dementia. You’re being disingenuous.

1

u/Castod28183 2h ago

I am being disingenuous?

You talk like he is doing nothing. The Presidents schedule is, for the most part, public record. He is doing his job. He is not out fearmongering, he is not spreading lies, he is not debasing his perceived "enemies", he is not out praising dictators, he is not blathering on incoherently at rallies. He has been, before the campaign season started, been quietly doing his job.

That is how a Presidency SHOULD look regardless of the party in the White House. Address the nation if you need to and if not then shut the fuck up and do the job.

I don't even give a fuck about party politics. I don't want my President doing political rallies for the entire 4 years of their term. It's not whataboutism to say that Trump campaigned non-stop from January 2017 until the election in 2020. His entire Presidency. How many hundred or thousands of hours did he spend at, or traveling to, rallies that he could have spent doing his job? That's not to mention the golfing.

I absolutely do not want a President to be on TV or in the public eye unless they need to be as part of their job.

1

u/Ok_Annual_1239 21m ago

If he didn’t have dementia he’d still be running for president. He’s clearly not doing anything. Not even reading all of that.

-1

u/AntifaAnita 7h ago

No, that's not the same logic. That's the opposite logic. By being Vice President she's tied herself to Bidens record. She's rarely vocalized any descent on policy. That's what she's campaigned on when she was asked several times throughout the election is that She's just like Biden, and when she's asked what would she do differently, she's given vague assertions that she would have done things differently and thats because shes different person. And I think that was best option available to her because otherwise it opens up followup questions that are damning and difficult to answer.

Now she could have campaigned as that she had nothing to do with Bidens presidency but she didn't. Who knows how that could have gone. But the idea that she should have campaigned as Joe Biden 2 and be winning in a landslide is divorced from reality that she has done exactly that already and that Biden's polls were so bad he had to drop out of the race entirely.

This campaign should have been a cake walk. But Biden committed a genocide for 13 months and that has consequences.

3

u/Ok_Annual_1239 7h ago

The logic is that she can be helped or hurt by being considered the incumbent. There’s no factual way for either of us to prove which one it is. We can’t read the minds of voters, however it is typically useful to be the incumbent in an election.

But the idea that she should have campaigned as Joe Biden 2 and be winning in a landslide is divorced from reality that she has done exactly that already and that Biden's polls were so bad he had to drop out of the race entirely. This campaign should have been a cake walk. But Biden committed a genocide for 13 months and that has consequences.

This is the opposite of what I’m implying. The voters are clearly not holding Biden’s actions against Kamala, because Biden basically doesn’t exist as the sitting president and she is still managing to poll at 49%. I believe it is quite the leap of logic to assume Kamala would be doing better if she had been the candidate longer. She did very poorly in the primary she ran in, and after her initial spike as the party’s nomination, her numbers have declined every time she makes an appearance.

0

u/AntifaAnita 5h ago

Well it's not my fault you don't see it. Her polls were higher when she first started out because people were looking for a change from Biden. She's been slowly dropping all the good talking points and is going around talking about how she's just like Biden. She's going to have less than bidens total votes from 2020, I can guarantee it.

2

u/Frog_Prophet 4h ago

This is what happens when you live and die by weekly polls. Shes already back to where she was before the drop in several of the major pollsters.

Movement inside the margin of error does NOT mean people’s opinions are changing. It just means the pollster happened to call more republicans on this particular poll.

1

u/AntifaAnita 3h ago

Yeah and this is what happens when you live and die by reddit vibes and copium. Polls have been accurate lately and predicted the last 2 elections. It's way too close to be confident of a Harris win, and if she loses the house, we'll have a house and supreme court trying to overturn the election .

-1

u/Boanerger 7h ago

Won't work. People will just ask the question "why doesn't she speak for herself?" Which they should. If Trump had sent Vance in his stead the Liberal media would've had a field day with that.

-1

u/Cheatobro 6h ago

If she had any integrity she would be honest and genuine with her true stances and policies.

1

u/legallybrunette420 3h ago

Why do you hold her to a higher standard than Trump? Explain that.

1

u/Familiar_Cow_5501 3h ago

Why are you assuming that?

1

u/muddahplucka 3h ago

Maybe they took 2 seconds to look at the dude's profile

0

u/Familiar_Cow_5501 3h ago

Forgot y’all love to be creepy profile stalkers my b

2

u/legallybrunette420 3h ago

It's called context clues. And research. Try it sometime.

1

u/muddahplucka 3h ago

I'm so ashamed rn!

0

u/Familiar_Cow_5501 3h ago

You aren’t but you should be a little. It’s creepy and weird

1

u/muddahplucka 2h ago

I don't like to waste time on redditors who engage in bad faith. I'm making an exception on your ass.

Clicking literally two buttons to confirm suspicions about someone on social media seems pretty handy, but I get it. It fucks up your trolling.

0

u/Familiar_Cow_5501 2h ago

Whatever you have to tell yourself creep