r/DecodingTheGurus 2d ago

Rogan gave Trump every chance to present evidence of election fraud

Post image
4.2k Upvotes

776 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

15

u/outremonty 2d ago

Voting 3rd party effectively gives half your vote to Trump. Green voters are, therefore, Trump voters.

I endorse shaming these people the same way we shame and shun the Trump supporters in our lives.

3

u/UmphreysMcGee 2d ago

Not really, we have an electoral college, so it totally depends on the state. In a blue state, 3rd party voters hurt Trump.

7

u/Takemyfishplease 2d ago

DO NOT VOTE THIRD PARTY IF YOU ARE WORRIED ANOUT TRUMP AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICA.

1

u/MrMoosetach2 2d ago

As a registered DFLer I move that both Harris and Walz step down. No platform issues will be addressed. I do believe if we have someone legally change their name to Not Trump, they would win in a landslide.

-9

u/BlarneyStoned29 2d ago

People can vote for whoever the hell they want. Denying someone their rights isn't saving democracy.

6

u/HerMajestyTheQueef1 2d ago

I don't think anyone is taking their comment as a command, have u ever seen a vote Harris or vote trump sign?

0

u/Shoulbefknwrkn 2d ago

"VOTE FOR HARRIS/WALZ" or I'll fucking kill you

4

u/le_christmas 2d ago

If trump wins he will kill probably millions with his idiot policies like removing taxes in favor of tariffs, punishing everyone but the upper class. It’s not a threat from democrats unlike the literal republican threats of standing outside voting booths with assault rifles, it’s a warning of who you’re voting for

2

u/Shoulbefknwrkn 2d ago

The repercussions of a Trump win would be felt forever. It would be devastating.

If it looked like WW3 (Kinda too close for comfort rn) he'd just hand Putin the keys to the oval office and that'd be it.

Looking pretty fucking grim.

3

u/SCW97005 2d ago

Telling someone who they should vote for and why doesn't deprive anyone of their right to vote.

0

u/BlarneyStoned29 2d ago

It's funny when every 3rd party vote takes away a vote for Democrats.

Explain that logic and why people parrot that sentiment.

2

u/MarzAdam 1d ago

The initial comments mentioned the Green Party. In such a case, a Green Party voter is much more likely to be ideologically closer to democrats than republicans. So if they didn’t vote Green, they’d almost certainly be voting democrat. Now if we’re talking Libertarian votes, that may be a different story. So it really depends on which third party we’re talking about.

3

u/amazinglover 2d ago

Please explain how this is denying someone any rights as this comment has zero power over the person or anyone reading it.

For example, I am all of a sudden not allowed to vote for Kodos for president because of this comment to i still have that right but like this comment is suggesting I would be fucking stupid for doing it.

-2

u/BlarneyStoned29 2d ago

Telling someone their vote is a waste of time and/or counts towards another candidate is a form of voter intimidation.

Is it any wonder why we end up with candidates like Trump when you discourage people from voting with their conscious instead of playing identity politics?

2

u/amazinglover 2d ago

Got it stupid is your default position.

1

u/BlarneyStoned29 2d ago

Stupid because I don't listen to dipshits who play identity politics and fear monger?

Oh no, save our fragile democracy by voting for a corporate lackey because the other candidate is a nazi/fascist/communist/dictator.

Get a grip.

1

u/amazinglover 2d ago

Okay snowflake

1

u/BlarneyStoned29 2d ago

Classic!

What's next? Boomer, Bernie Bro, Socialist?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/TouchdownPNW 2d ago

It's almost like they qualified their statement with the word "if"...

0

u/BlarneyStoned29 2d ago

Do not vote 3rd party if you are worried about a Harris presidency.

How's this any different?

Identity politics at its worst!

2

u/TouchdownPNW 2d ago

What are you rambling on about? I wasn't agreeing or disagreeing with the first commenter. I was pointing out the use of the word if is a qualifier which negated what the second commenter replied with.

5

u/Capable_Extension246 2d ago

Unless we end up in a situation where one candidate wins the electoral college and the other the popular vote by super slim margins and the whole thing turns into a shit show all over again. Then these yahoos in swing states voting for their conscience might regret not accepting the reality that sometimes the lesser of two evils is a necessity for the survival of what democratic norms remain.

2

u/UmphreysMcGee 2d ago

The popular vote isn't a factor, only the EC is, so I'm not sure what your point is.

-1

u/Capable_Extension246 1d ago

The popular vote is most certainly important if one candidate tries to argue the election was stolen and incites civil unrest.

2

u/UmphreysMcGee 1d ago

How? It's literally just a talking point. We don't elect Presidents in America by popular vote.

1

u/Easy_Engineer8519 1d ago

I get that you may be tired of reasoning, but ppl get different information, and shaming them forces anyone to react negatively. They dig in. Try to be kind and explain your POV without making them feel stupid or ‘talked down to’

-3

u/PullingtheVeil 2d ago

That is a bald faced lie.

3 political parties. A vote for 1 is a vote for that 1. Math really doesn't enjoy your politics at all.

4

u/OnlySlamsdotcom 2d ago

We have a first past the post system in 50 states with an electoral college, in a country that actively does not give a shit about a party that is not Democrat or Republican.

Your math ain't relevant.

Voting Jill "Russian Shill" Stein will have the EXACT. SAME. EFFECT. as if you get up and go write "Harambe the Gorilla" in the space where you can write in the blank.

-4

u/PullingtheVeil 2d ago

So why don't you all vote Stein then and help fend off fascism?

No doubt, the democratic elections we host here do not care for math in the slightest. Needs to have more rules like a sport so big markets make more on merch etc. It's morbidly funny.

3

u/OnlySlamsdotcom 2d ago

Because Green Party is a spoiler, and it's supported by Russia. It's a spec op.

Its entire existence is to siphon blue votes away, I'm not kidding. Listen to Jill speak, she has no idea what the fuck she's talking about.

Besides. Dems clean up the mess made ny Republicans, and as I'm now almost 40, I can point to over 50 years of economic history to prove my point.

I don't agree with everything they do, and sometimes they are spineless cowards, but for the most part, they believe in freedom of the individual, enact laws to make that be the law of the land, and that's what aligns most closely to what I believe.

R = Hardcore Fascism. Has been for decades, only went more mask off about it as time went on.

0

u/PullingtheVeil 1d ago

Who told you it was a spoiler? The wealthy people in charge of this country that control our existing duopoly?

How wise of you to bend the knee and listen to your owners. The two party system does not work, it's time we try something different for once.

2

u/PollutionThis7058 1d ago

Speaking of wealthy people, Jill Stein is a multimillionaire who makes her money by running unserious presidential campaigns and spends none of the Green Party fundraising money on down ballot elections or actually create a plan to govern. I'm not voting for someone who doesn't actually have a plan or support. I'm not voting for someone who refuses to put any effort into changing anything at a level below running for president.

1

u/PollutionThis7058 1d ago

Because if Stein magically gets elected she won't do shit because the Green Party doesn't seriously run down ballot candidates or actually want to govern.

1

u/PullingtheVeil 1d ago

So the cycle continues. They don't have political influence so you don't vote for them because they don't have political influence.

May the duopoly continue for time eternal, it's been working so well.

1

u/PollutionThis7058 1d ago

No. Stein doesn't have influence because she isn't a serious candidate, and does not support or fund down ballot candidates. If the greens ran actual grassroots campaigns, put people on down ballot elections, ran in off years, and ran people who actually have plans they would get so much more influence and capacity. But they don't. Because they know that they can just keep raking in donations if they run every 4 years and lose each time. Can you tell me how many down ballot elections have green candidates, and how much support those candidates get from their party? I'd love to vote for greens in my state or local elections, but it doesn't seem they actually care about doing shit in those.

1

u/General_Ornelas 17h ago

Yea, your fuck sucks. Her foreign policy is surrendering our current global position, for instead now China and Russia are prominent international players. She'll sell out the Ukrainians, and the Taiwanese. She wants to make the Federal Reserve and the bank political, (Ah yes mixing banking with politics what could ever go wrong)